From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dann Corbit" To: help-gcc@gnu.org Subject: GCC performance for various compilers under Win32 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 14:16:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 1999-12/msg00316.html Since there seems to be a number of options: 0. Mingw32 1. Uwin 2. Cygnus 3. ?? Others ?? Which GCC compiler seems to have the best performance for Intel machines as far as: 0. Compile speed 1. Integer optimization 2. Floating point optimization 3. Overall optimization Has anyone studied this? -- C-FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html "The C-FAQ Book" ISBN 0-201-84519-9 C.A.P. Newsgroup http://www.dejanews.com/~c_a_p C.A.P. FAQ: ftp://38.168.214.175/pub/Chess%20Analysis%20Project%20FAQ.htm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dann Corbit" To: help-gcc@gnu.org Subject: GCC performance for various compilers under Win32 Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 22:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 1999-12n/msg00316.html Message-ID: <19991231222400.x-cct_JcBNVL8A5gvIIfYl3Hdw9rIefeot_56i0MCkA@z> Since there seems to be a number of options: 0. Mingw32 1. Uwin 2. Cygnus 3. ?? Others ?? Which GCC compiler seems to have the best performance for Intel machines as far as: 0. Compile speed 1. Integer optimization 2. Floating point optimization 3. Overall optimization Has anyone studied this? -- C-FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html "The C-FAQ Book" ISBN 0-201-84519-9 C.A.P. Newsgroup http://www.dejanews.com/~c_a_p C.A.P. FAQ: ftp://38.168.214.175/pub/Chess%20Analysis%20Project%20FAQ.htm