From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-help-return-64728-listarch-gcc-help=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5684 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2020 23:24:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-help.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5539 invoked by uid 89); 4 Feb 2020 23:24:52 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*f:sk:CAH6eHd, __fastcall__, Edward, Diener
X-HELO: ciao.gmane.io
Received: from ciao.gmane.io (HELO ciao.gmane.io) (159.69.161.202) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:24:49 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)	(envelope-from <gcc-help@m.gmane-mx.org>)	id 1iz7Yg-000HY1-Sc	for gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:24:42 +0100
To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
From: Edward Diener <eldlistmailingz@tropicsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Function attributes and x32, x64
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 23:24:00 -0000
Message-ID: <r1cufl$21c9$1@ciao.gmane.io>
References: <r13m4f$jj6$1@ciao.gmane.io> <CAH6eHdSA1AHR8hgJyPj7rPoQ+qcAF4yFq11rgK0mdqVDo1xuCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdSA1AHR8hgJyPj7rPoQ+qcAF4yFq11rgK0mdqVDo1xuCQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00034.txt.bz2

On 2/4/2020 12:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 at 11:07, Edward Diener
> <eldlistmailingz@tropicsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> Given the code:
>>
>> class cbase;
>> int main()
>>       {
>>       typedef int __attribute__ ((__stdcall__)) (cbase::* atype)();
>>       typedef int __attribute__ ((__cdecl__)) (cbase::* btype)();
>>       typedef int __attribute__ ((__fastcall__)) (cbase::* ctype)();
>>       typedef int __attribute__ ((__thiscall__)) (cbase::* dtype)();
>>       return 0;
>>       }
>>
>>
>> If I compile this for x64 (-m64) in gcc-9.2 I receive no errors or
> 
> Aside: Please don't misuse the term "x32" (which means something
> different here), and avoid the dumb "x64" term (which is a
> Windows-ism).
> 

Do you prefer I should rather say x86-32 and x86-64 for 32-bit and 
64-bit compilation respectively ? That is OK with me. But the issue of 
the error messages when using x86-32 compilation is still baffling to me.