From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 503 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2004 14:08:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 473 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2004 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mgr2.xmission.com) (198.60.22.202) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2004 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from [198.60.22.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BE7Xa-0000WF-02; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:08:30 -0600 Received: from [198.60.22.20] (helo=xmission.xmission.com) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BE7XZ-0007Cd-Sr; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:08:29 -0600 Received: from llewelly by xmission.xmission.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BE7XZ-0004zU-00; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 08:08:29 -0600 To: "Chandrakala M" Cc: , References: <016a01c42219$0ed23340$4166582b@chandrakalam> From: llewelly@xmission.com Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <016a01c42219$0ed23340$4166582b@chandrakalam> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: GCOV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=8.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: llewelly@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Wed Aug 20 09:38:54 PDT 2003) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 "Chandrakala M" writes: > Hi, > > Can anyone clairfy these I don't think your questions have much to do with gcc. Why don't you search: http://ltp.sourceforge.net/coverage/gcov-kernel.php for an appropriate forum. Maybe the people who wrote it can answer your questions. > > 1. gcov kernel patch - Can this patch be applied to any OS > which has gcc support & proc support? I would be very surprised to hear of a kernel patch which was not specific to a particular OS. Kernel code is the most OS-specific part of an OS. > > 2. Can we port this patch & apply it on mac os or any > OS? If not what are the constraints? > > 3. Is there any patch that is similar to this that can be > used on mac os or any os? > > 4. what happens when .da files data is read, how is taken > from /proc or tracefile? > > 5. Can u mail me any mailing lists where i can get > information regarding GCOV patch?