From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29975 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2004 17:37:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29948 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2004 17:37:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mgr2.xmission.com) (198.60.22.202) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2004 17:37:48 -0000 Received: from [198.60.22.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BBdTG-0002vv-02; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:37:46 -0600 Received: from [198.60.22.20] (helo=xmission.xmission.com) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BBdTG-00072i-RM; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:37:46 -0600 Received: from llewelly by xmission.xmission.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BBdTG-0003h6-00; Thu, 08 Apr 2004 11:37:46 -0600 To: Nizar ROMDHANE Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040408065346.01fbfa60@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <407547AB.6000306@st.com> From: llewelly@xmission.com Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <407547AB.6000306@st.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: gcc v2.96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=8.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: llewelly@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Wed Aug 20 09:38:54 PDT 2003) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg00098.txt.bz2 Nizar ROMDHANE writes: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to get the source code for gcc v2.96 (the one shipped with > several linux distributions) but I can not find it on the website of > gnu. Can anyone help me. I heard alco about the existence of a > v2.95.4, is it true? I f yes where to download it? Certain OS implementors - freebsd and debian come to mind - for a time used a snapshot of the gcc 2.95.x branch taken after the gcc 2.95.3, with OS-specific modifications/bugfixes. They called the resulting compiler 'gcc 2.95.4' . There was no fsf gcc 2.95.4, and more than one non-fsf gcc 2.95.4 . (Similarily for 2.96; there are non-fsf gccs not related to the redhat 2.96 which are called 2.96 .)