From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1652 invoked by alias); 27 May 2004 12:56:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1598 invoked from network); 27 May 2004 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mgr2.xmission.com) (198.60.22.202) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 27 May 2004 12:56:52 -0000 Received: from [198.60.22.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BTKRH-00012L-02; Thu, 27 May 2004 06:56:51 -0600 Received: from [166.70.238.3] (helo=xmission.xmission.com) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BTKRG-0007zi-SY; Thu, 27 May 2004 06:56:50 -0600 Received: from llewelly by xmission.xmission.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BTKRG-000514-00; Thu, 27 May 2004 06:56:50 -0600 To: Sumit Jain Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org References: <20031204000558.GD23084@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040128122317.GI8094@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20040129101203.GB30883@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20040201215520.GI30324@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <40293A4D.5060502@redhat.com> <40293C78.4000303@redhat.com> <20040210202725.GJ1382@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> From: llewelly@xmission.com Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 12:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Tree-SSA: Grammer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=8.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: llewelly@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Wed Aug 20 09:38:54 PDT 2003) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-SW-Source: 2004-05/txt/msg00297.txt.bz2 Sumit Jain writes: > Hi, > > I am planning to use tree-ssa branch of gcc for my project which involves > some program analysis. I have tried to read all the documents related to > tree-ssa. But I am not sure that the GENERIC grammer given in the > gccsummit-2003-proceedings.pdf is complete or not. I have this doubt > because when I see the implementation of few functions related to ssa, I > see some NIY statements. > > Is anyone using the ssa branch for the some purpose ? If you know about > this grammer, could you please clarify my doubt. You will get much better answers to this question on gcc at gcc.gnu.org .