* difference in int,long behavior in gcc-3.4 4.0 vs 4.1 4.2
@ 2007-06-01 20:10 Oleg Verych
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Oleg Verych @ 2007-06-01 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-help
Hallo.
I have question about `int' silently becoming `long' in 4.1 and 4.2
GCC on AMD64.
`For' loop gets infinity on 3.4, 4.0 due to
int i; // ssize_t => signed long bar; amd64
for (i=0;i<bar;i+=2)...
4.1 and 4.2 are fine!
It's swab() in the dietlibc with at least two bugs, but this one is worth
asking here.
Test, code, compile switches and discussion are here:
Message-ID: <20070531084442.GB7266@flower.upol.cz>
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lib.dietlibc/1161>
Thanks.
____
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2007-06-01 20:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-01 20:10 difference in int,long behavior in gcc-3.4 4.0 vs 4.1 4.2 Oleg Verych
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).