From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67494 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2020 17:22:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 67485 invoked by uid 89); 15 Feb 2020 17:22:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,FREEMAIL_FROM,GARBLED_BODY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=MAINTAINERS X-HELO: mail4.protonmail.ch Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch (HELO mail4.protonmail.ch) (185.70.40.27) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:22:18 +0000 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 17:22:00 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1581787335; bh=8y23Ts3GLwRgqW37ZLnSukq2K3bd51PtfW3ec+A2Orw=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From; b=UvnHfsDqbAq8GEnWyZr7vf2bqhrMgCmULG4khKj7+ZYX6DvvlO+hkqyXrDPqAIs+z dQfT4OFgCKR8ks2zHXHeSinDosyZbLU9eAj3IQ0KlNq3+l5/j7YrCF4XKz8KDHPtD8 A5fgCzFnz8o+leNme77Fj8Z9eIU3aGZ3dzms/tbE= To: Segher Boessenkool From: GT Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "tnggil@protonmail.com" Reply-To: GT Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecure Vector Function ABI. Message-ID: <-iQC_PJgqmh8iR4KYC9C438q_5FOpU2mzByeMP3r1_kyVxye8CgvyKY9SG2GdbvchvKr3HITGy3UCFKaZOU4cEvC2ZewWRQ0UAfYW9GHeH0=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200214234632.GP22482@gate.crashing.org> References: <20200214234632.GP22482@gate.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00916.txt.bz2 =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, February 14, 2020 6:46 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 08:24:30PM +0000, GT wrote: > > > Function rs6000_simd_clone_adjust, even though it's body is empty, > > cannot simply be removed. I tried it. It resulted in ICE. In my > > view, leaving it empty is preferable to modifying other files > > unrelated to rs6000.c in order to avoid having a function whose > > body is empty. > > Please Cc: the rs6000 maintainers on rs6000 patches, you will get a > reply faster, and more reliably. > File MAINTAINERS has you, David Edelsohn and Aldy Hernandez listed as maint= ainers of various rs6000 aspects. Is that who you say I should "Cc:" or is there a separate mailing list for rs6000? > Please don't use binary attachments, it takes effort to reply to those. > I have not been able to configure protonmail for either git imap-send or se= nd-email. Will try pasting the .patch inline as plain text and see if that works. Bert.