From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-394285-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 109616 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2015 04:58:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 109600 invoked by uid 89); 30 Mar 2015 04:58:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (HELO eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com) (207.82.80.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:58:48 +0000
Received: from cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) by uk-mta-10.uk.mimecast.lan; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:58:45 +0100
Received: from SHAWIN202 ([10.1.2.79]) by cam-owa1.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);	 Mon, 30 Mar 2015 05:58:44 +0100
From: "Thomas Preud'homme" <thomas.preudhomme@arm.com>
To: "'Steven Bosscher'" <stevenb.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <000501d049d3$079385a0$16ba90e0$@arm.com> <CABu31nMdEDzr_mPvZvN=zuLMmGRDBP3wDb-6FLX2xUz13Qn2fw@mail.gmail.com> <000601d04a5c$a0c0f030$e242d090$@arm.com> <CABu31nO-FyF_T3KCv1PW-ndAotCKdxpjzROm7kjTEb5p2DEt3A@mail.gmail.com> <000001d062e8$ece63930$c6b2ab90$@arm.com> <000101d062f8$68a35350$39e9f9f0$@arm.com> <CABu31nMq-md5ZRAovEzcOM8tPYH8GJZn-pb6tQTPJcHA=F=zjg@mail.gmail.com> <000201d06558$acd8a130$0689e390$@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <000201d06558$acd8a130$0689e390$@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH, GCC, stage1] Fallback to copy-prop if constant-prop not possible
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <000001d06aa6$2f12c8e0$8d385aa0$@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: AFBIlwUFSUmWc0EF8vdtIQ-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-03/txt/msg01525.txt.bz2

> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Preud'homme
>=20
> FYI testing your patch with the one cprop_reg_p negated as said in my
> previous email shows no regression on arm-none-eabi cross-compiler
> targeting Cortex-M3. Testing for x86_64 is ongoing.

Sorry, I forgot to report back on this. No regression as well on x86_64-lin=
ux-gnu.

Do you want me to respin the patch (adding the testcase from the patch I
sent, fixing the indentation and adding a ChangeLog)?

Best regards,

Thomas