From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16981 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2011 17:31:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 16973 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2011 17:31:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (94.185.240.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with SMTP; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:30:55 +0000 Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:30:52 +0100 Received: from e102530 ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:30:50 +0100 From: "Yufeng Zhang" To: "'Paolo Carlini'" Cc: , References: <000001cc246f$72b81c20$58285460$@Zhang@arm.com> <001601cc31c4$2c367820$84a36860$@Zhang@arm.com> <4E08B9A0.50301@oracle.com> <000801cc3810$4cab51f0$e601f5d0$@Zhang@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <000801cc3810$4cab51f0$e601f5d0$@Zhang@arm.com> Subject: RE: [PING] [PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Add newlib specific ctype_members.cc Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <000d01cc4314$ef00b670$cd022350$@Zhang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: 111071518305200801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg01269.txt.bz2 Hi Paolo, > -----Original Message----- > From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- > owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Yufeng Zhang > Sent: 01 July 2011 18:00 > To: 'Paolo Carlini' > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: RE: [PING] [PATCH, libstdc++-v3] Add newlib specific > ctype_members.cc >=20 > Hi Paolo, >=20 > Thank you for the review. >=20 > > > Ping for: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00440.html > > personally, I have only minor comments, like only 2011 as Copyright > > year for new files, and please also regtest on a gnu-linux system. >=20 > I've updated the Copyright year and removed the regenerated file from > the patch. The updated patch is attached. >=20 > I've also run the regtest on x86_64-linux-gnu. >=20 > > Before going ahead, however, you should send the patch also to the > > libstdc++ mailing list (this is the rule for v3 patches) and make > sure > > the other maintainers don't have further comments. Wait, say, at > least > > a couple of days. >=20 > Sorry for missing the rule previously. I sent the patch to the > libstdc++ > mailing list yesterday; see > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-06/msg00091.html > I've also added the mailing list to the CC list. I'll wait a few days > to see if there is any more comment. There is no more comment received. I wonder if it is OK to get the patch committed. I have write after approval to GCC, but I'm not sure if that applies to libstdc++-v3 or not. If you think the patch is OK, can you please help me commit it? If you think I can/shall commit it by myself, please let me know. Thanks, Yufeng P.S. I have re-verified the patch on the tip of the trunk today.