From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-374570-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7907 invoked by alias); 7 Aug 2014 09:46:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7896 invoked by uid 89); 7 Aug 2014 09:46:42 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: service87.mimecast.com
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:46:41 +0000
Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Thu, 07 Aug 2014 10:46:39 +0100
Received: from shawin233 ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);	 Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:46:37 +0100
From: "Bin Cheng" <bin.cheng@arm.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH lto]Fix the mis-matched arguments of lto_define_builtins
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <000e01cfb224$7ba8caa0$72fa5fe0$@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MC-Unique: 114080710463900801
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB267.89CCA6E0"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2014-08/txt/msg00779.txt.bz2

This is a multipart message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB267.89CCA6E0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-length: 339

Hi,
As analyzed in PR62032, this patch fixes the latent lto bug by switching
arguments of lto_define_builtins, otherwise vsnprintf-chk.c would fail on
arm/aarch64 with lto options.

Is it ok if bootstrap and test pass?


2014-08-07  Bin Cheng  <bin.cheng@arm.com>

	PR lto/62032
	* lto/lto-lang.c (lto_init): Switch mis-matched arguments.

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB267.89CCA6E0
Content-Type: text/plain; name=lto-va_list-builtins-20140807.txt
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="lto-va_list-builtins-20140807.txt"
Content-length: 638

Index: gcc/lto/lto-lang.c
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
--- gcc/lto/lto-lang.c	(revision 213698)
+++ gcc/lto/lto-lang.c	(working copy)
@@ -1192,10 +1192,10 @@ lto_init (void)
     }
   else
     {
-      lto_define_builtins (va_list_type_node,
-			   build_reference_type (va_list_type_node));
+      lto_define_builtins (build_reference_type (va_list_type_node),
+			   va_list_type_node);
     }
-=20=20
+
   if (flag_cilkplus)
     cilk_init_builtins ();
=20

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01CFB267.89CCA6E0--