On 27/04/15 15:37, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:55:17AM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>> Precedents suggest these changes are considered obvious.
>> So I'll commit this in a couple of days unless someone objects.
>
> Yes it's obvious.  One tiny thing...
>
>> @@ -9062,7 +9061,7 @@ known_cond (rtx x, enum rtx_code cond, rtx reg, rtx
val)
>>    else if (COMPARISON_P (x) || COMMUTATIVE_ARITH_P (x))
>>      {
>>        if (rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), val))
>> -	cond = swap_condition (cond), temp = val, val = reg, reg = temp;
>> +	cond = swap_condition (cond), std::swap (val, reg);
>>  
>>        if (rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, 0), reg) && rtx_equal_p (XEXP (x, 1),
val))
>>  	{
>
> Might as well write this as two statements, like everywhere else, e.g.
>
>> @@ -11454,7 +11453,7 @@ simplify_comparison (enum rtx_code code, rtx
*pop0, rtx *pop1)
>>       is already a constant integer.  */
>>    if (swap_commutative_operands_p (op0, op1))
>>      {
>> -      tem = op0, op0 = op1, op1 = tem;
>> +      std::swap (op0, op1);
>>        code = swap_condition (code);
>>      }
>
> Thanks,

Thanks, here's what I committed with r222468.

Kyrill

>
>
>
> Segher
>