public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Sayle" <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
To: "'Uros Bizjak'" <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: "'GCC Patches'" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [x86_64 PATCH] Add post-reload splitter for extendditi2.
Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2023 14:55:48 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01d91df1$241155e0$6c3401a0$@nextmovesoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4ZSJ862c79KmGimgrACZOJcfXRg9TPH5E7-JyexDs=8gw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4178 bytes --]


Hi Uros,
Happy New Year.
As requested here's a revised version of my patch to introduce a pattern for
extendditi2, but implementing your suggestion to re-use the existing
extendsidi2_1 splitters and peephole2 optimizations by using DWI/DWIH
mode iterators.

This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32},
with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?

2023-01-01  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
	    Uroš Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>

gcc/ChangeLog
	* config/i386/i386.md (extendditi2): New define_insn.
	(define_split): Use DWIH mode iterator to treat new extendditi2
	identically to existing extendsidi2_1.
	(define_peephole2): Likewise.
	(define_peephole2): Likewise.
	(define_split): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
	* gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-1.c: New test case.
	* gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-2.c: Likewise.


Thanks in advance,
Roger
--

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
> Sent: 28 December 2022 09:28
> To: Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
> Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Subject: Re: [x86_64 PATCH] Add post-reload splitter for extendditi2.
> 
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 1:32 AM Roger Sayle
> <roger@nextmovesoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is another step towards a possible solution for PR 105137.
> > This patch introduces a define_insn_and_split for extendditi2, that
> > allows DImode to TImode sign-extension to be represented in the early
> > RTL optimizers, before being split post-reload into the exact same
> > idiom as currently produced by RTL expansion.
> 
> Please see extendsidi2_1 insn pattern and follow-up splitters and
> peephole2 patterns that do exactly what you want to achieve, but they are
> currently handling only SImode to DImode on 32-bit targets. OTOH, these
> patterns handle several more cases (e.g. split to the memory
> output) and just have to be macroized with DWIH mode iterator to also handle
> DImode to TImode on 64-bit targets. Probably, an extendsidi expander will have
> to be slightly adjusted when macroized to signal middle end the availability of
> extendditi pattern.
> 
> Following macroization, any possible follow-up optimizations and improvements
> will then be automatically applied also to 32-bit targets.
> 
> Uros.
> 
> >
> > Typically this produces the identical code, so the first new test
> > case:
> > __int128 foo(long long x) { return (__int128)x; }
> >
> > continues to generate:
> > foo:    movq    %rdi, %rax
> >         cqto
> >         ret
> >
> > The "magic" is that this representation allows combine and the other
> > RTL optimizers to do a better job.  Hence, the second test case:
> >
> > __int128 foo(__int128 a, long long b) {
> >     a += ((__int128)b) << 70;
> >     return a;
> > }
> >
> > which mainline with -O2 currently generates as:
> >
> > foo:    movq    %rsi, %rax
> >         movq    %rdx, %rcx
> >         movq    %rdi, %rsi
> >         salq    $6, %rcx
> >         movq    %rax, %rdi
> >         xorl    %eax, %eax
> >         movq    %rcx, %rdx
> >         addq    %rsi, %rax
> >         adcq    %rdi, %rdx
> >         ret
> >
> > with this patch now becomes:
> > foo:    movl    $0, %eax
> >         salq    $6, %rdx
> >         addq    %rdi, %rax
> >         adcq    %rsi, %rdx
> >         ret
> >
> > i.e. the same code for the signed and unsigned extension variants.
> >
> > This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
> > and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32},
> > with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?
> >
> > 2022-12-28  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog
> >         * config/i386/i386.md (extendditi2): New define_insn_and_split
> >         to split DImode to TImode sign-extension after reload.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >         * gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-1.c: New test case.
> >         * gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-2.c: Likewise.
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Roger
> > --
> >

[-- Attachment #2: patchst2.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 7207 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index ca40c4f..890c4c8 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -4548,17 +4548,27 @@
   "!TARGET_64BIT"
   "#")
 
+(define_insn "extendditi2"
+  [(set (match_operand:TI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=*A,r,?r,?*o")
+	(sign_extend:TI (match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "0,0,r,r")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))
+   (clobber (match_scratch:DI 2 "=X,X,X,&r"))]
+  "TARGET_64BIT"
+  "#")
+
 ;; Split the memory case.  If the source register doesn't die, it will stay
 ;; this way, if it does die, following peephole2s take care of it.
 (define_split
-  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "memory_operand")
-	(sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand")))
+  [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "memory_operand")
+	(sign_extend:<DWI> (match_operand:DWIH 1 "register_operand")))
    (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))
-   (clobber (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand"))]
+   (clobber (match_operand:DWIH 2 "register_operand"))]
   "reload_completed"
   [(const_int 0)]
 {
-  split_double_mode (DImode, &operands[0], 1, &operands[3], &operands[4]);
+  rtx bits = GEN_INT (<MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT - 1);
+
+  split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 1, &operands[3], &operands[4]);
 
   emit_move_insn (operands[3], operands[1]);
 
@@ -4567,12 +4577,12 @@
       && REGNO (operands[1]) == AX_REG
       && REGNO (operands[2]) == DX_REG)
     {
-      emit_insn (gen_ashrsi3_cvt (operands[2], operands[1], GEN_INT (31)));
+      emit_insn (gen_ashr<mode>3_cvt (operands[2], operands[1], bits));
     }
   else
     {
       emit_move_insn (operands[2], operands[1]);
-      emit_insn (gen_ashrsi3_cvt (operands[2], operands[2], GEN_INT (31)));
+      emit_insn (gen_ashr<mode>3_cvt (operands[2], operands[2], bits));
     }
   emit_move_insn (operands[4], operands[2]);
   DONE;
@@ -4581,69 +4591,79 @@
 ;; Peepholes for the case where the source register does die, after
 ;; being split with the above splitter.
 (define_peephole2
-  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "memory_operand")
-	(match_operand:SI 1 "general_reg_operand"))
-   (set (match_operand:SI 2 "general_reg_operand") (match_dup 1))
+  [(set (match_operand:DWIH 0 "memory_operand")
+	(match_operand:DWIH 1 "general_reg_operand"))
+   (set (match_operand:DWIH 2 "general_reg_operand") (match_dup 1))
    (parallel [(set (match_dup 2)
-		   (ashiftrt:SI (match_dup 2) (const_int 31)))
+		   (ashiftrt:DWIH (match_dup 2)
+				  (match_operand 4 "const_int_operand")))
 	       (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])
-   (set (match_operand:SI 3 "memory_operand") (match_dup 2))]
+   (set (match_operand:DWIH 3 "memory_operand") (match_dup 2))]
   "REGNO (operands[1]) != REGNO (operands[2])
+   && INTVAL (operands[4]) == (<MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT - 1)
    && peep2_reg_dead_p (2, operands[1])
    && peep2_reg_dead_p (4, operands[2])
    && !reg_mentioned_p (operands[2], operands[3])"
   [(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
-   (parallel [(set (match_dup 1) (ashiftrt:SI (match_dup 1) (const_int 31)))
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 1) (ashiftrt:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))
 	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])
    (set (match_dup 3) (match_dup 1))])
 
 (define_peephole2
-  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "memory_operand")
-	(match_operand:SI 1 "general_reg_operand"))
-   (parallel [(set (match_operand:SI 2 "general_reg_operand")
-		   (ashiftrt:SI (match_dup 1) (const_int 31)))
+  [(set (match_operand:DWIH 0 "memory_operand")
+	(match_operand:DWIH 1 "general_reg_operand"))
+   (parallel [(set (match_operand:DWIH 2 "general_reg_operand")
+		   (ashiftrt:DWIH (match_dup 1)
+				  (match_operand 4 "const_int_operand")))
 	       (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])
-   (set (match_operand:SI 3 "memory_operand") (match_dup 2))]
+   (set (match_operand:DWIH 3 "memory_operand") (match_dup 2))]
   "/* cltd is shorter than sarl $31, %eax */
    !optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun)
    && REGNO (operands[1]) == AX_REG
    && REGNO (operands[2]) == DX_REG
+   && INTVAL (operands[4]) == (<MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT - 1)
    && peep2_reg_dead_p (2, operands[1])
    && peep2_reg_dead_p (3, operands[2])
    && !reg_mentioned_p (operands[2], operands[3])"
   [(set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 1))
-   (parallel [(set (match_dup 1) (ashiftrt:SI (match_dup 1) (const_int 31)))
+   (parallel [(set (match_dup 1) (ashiftrt:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))
 	      (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])
    (set (match_dup 3) (match_dup 1))])
 
 ;; Extend to register case.  Optimize case where source and destination
 ;; registers match and cases where we can use cltd.
 (define_split
-  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand")
-	(sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand")))
+  [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand")
+	(sign_extend:<DWI> (match_operand:DWIH 1 "register_operand")))
    (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))
-   (clobber (match_scratch:SI 2))]
+   (clobber (match_scratch:DWIH 2))]
   "reload_completed"
   [(const_int 0)]
 {
-  split_double_mode (DImode, &operands[0], 1, &operands[3], &operands[4]);
+  rtx bits = GEN_INT (<MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT - 1);
+
+  split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 1, &operands[3], &operands[4]);
 
   if (REGNO (operands[3]) != REGNO (operands[1]))
     emit_move_insn (operands[3], operands[1]);
 
+  rtx src = operands[1];
+  if (REGNO (operands[3]) == AX_REG)
+    src = operands[3];
+
   /* Generate a cltd if possible and doing so it profitable.  */
   if ((optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun) || TARGET_USE_CLTD)
-      && REGNO (operands[3]) == AX_REG
+      && REGNO (src) == AX_REG
       && REGNO (operands[4]) == DX_REG)
     {
-      emit_insn (gen_ashrsi3_cvt (operands[4], operands[3], GEN_INT (31)));
+      emit_insn (gen_ashr<mode>3_cvt (operands[4], src, bits));
       DONE;
     }
 
   if (REGNO (operands[4]) != REGNO (operands[1]))
     emit_move_insn (operands[4], operands[1]);
 
-  emit_insn (gen_ashrsi3_cvt (operands[4], operands[4], GEN_INT (31)));
+  emit_insn (gen_ashr<mode>3_cvt (operands[4], operands[4], bits));
   DONE;
 })
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..efbad0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+__int128 foo(long long x)
+{
+  return (__int128)x;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "cqt?o" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dbfa6fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/extendditi2-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+__int128 foo(__int128 a, long long b) {
+    a += ((__int128)b) << 70;
+    return a;
+}
+
+__int128 bar(__int128 a, unsigned long long b) {
+    a += ((__int128)b) << 70;
+    return a;
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movq" } } */

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-01 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-28  0:32 Roger Sayle
2022-12-28  9:28 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-01-01 14:55   ` Roger Sayle [this message]
2023-01-01 15:22     ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001e01d91df1$241155e0$6c3401a0$@nextmovesoftware.com' \
    --to=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).