From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47907 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2015 15:13:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47893 invoked by uid 89); 24 Apr 2015 15:13:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.rt-rk.com Received: from mx2.rt-rk.com (HELO mail.rt-rk.com) (89.216.37.149) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:13:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.rt-rk.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0762F1A224D; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:13:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.rt-rk.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.rt-rk.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id fs7HKzmalp8L; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rtrkn137 (rtrkn137.domain.local [192.168.236.60]) by mail.rt-rk.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD3461A118A; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:13:03 +0200 (CEST) From: "Petar Jovanovic" To: "'Maciej W. Rozycki'" Cc: , , "'Matthew Fortune'" References: <005001d07c5a$8c9e9b90$a5dbd2b0$@rt-rk.com> <004301d07d12$ee45f5b0$cad1e110$@rt-rk.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH v3][MIPS] fix CRT_CALL_STATIC_FUNCTION macro Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <003501d07ea1$29c7d1a0$7d5774e0$@rt-rk.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg01513.txt.bz2 -----Original Message----- From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:macro@linux-mips.org] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 4:55 PM To: Petar Jovanovic Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Catherine_Moore@mentor.com; Matthew Fortune Subject: RE: [PATCH v3][MIPS] fix CRT_CALL_STATIC_FUNCTION macro > I hope you find this explanation satisfactory, however if you still find > anything unclear or have any other questions or concerns, then please > shout. Hi Maciej, Thank you for your response. I should have coined my question better though, so you do not need to write it all. In the v4 patch, I have skipped the test for bare iron targets. > BTW, can you please change 0x0FF00000 to 0x0FFF0000 or suchlike to avoid > making the executable larger than absolutely necessary Done. > You didn't mention in your patch description why you picked up these particular addresses. There is a comment in the test which indicates that. I have put it as part of the commit message now as well. Regards, Petar