RE: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N

["Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>]

On 28 August 2007 19:05, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> I don't see you citing sources for *any* of your claims that it will
> make things more difficult for our users.

On 28 August 2007 19:09, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> BTW, The next time you want to argue about data, please don't pull
> figures out of thin air by claiming to know what our users's hardship
> level is and whether it will be increased or not, without real data.
> 
> After all, you are the one who claimed it would be harder for users.
> Please provide your evidence and data that this is true.  Not
> arguments.  Real, hard, absolute data.
> After all, you wouldn't have said it if you didn't have numbers, since
> you "never pull data out of thin air".
> 
> I await your reply and data!

  You appear to have seen some claim or claims in one or more of my posts.  I am
not aware of having made any.  I wrote:

>   Also, when that time comes, we *do* have to have the discussion about
> increasing the requirements on ordinary users as opposed to developers.

  That discussion would indeed be about whether or not and to what extent if any
the change would increase the requirement on ordinary users.  I was not
prejudging or pre-empting that hypothetical future discussion, nor making any
claims about the conclusion it would reach.

  So, to sum up: I don't see you citing any sources for *any* of your claims that
I have made any claims that it will make things more difficult for our users.

  Now, shall we recurse this discussion one more level?  :-P lol

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....