public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Sayle" <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [x86 PATCH] PR target/106122: Don't update %esp via the stack with -Oz.
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 00:00:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <008301d88cd5$2936ce90$7ba46bb0$@nextmovesoftware.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1030 bytes --]


When optimizing for size with -Oz, setting a register can be minimized by
pushing an immediate value to the stack and popping it to the destination.
Alas the one general register that shouldn't be updated via the stack is
the stack pointer itself, where "pop %esp" can't be represented in GCC's
RTL ("use of a register mentioned in pre_inc, pre_dec, post_inc or
post_dec is not permitted within the same instruction").  This patch
fixes PR target/106122 by explicitly checking for SP_REG in the
problematic peephole2.

This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
with no new failures.  Ok for mainline?


2022-06-30  Roger Sayle  <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>

gcc/ChangeLog
        PR target/106122
        * config/i386/i386.md (peephole2): Avoid generating pop %esp
        when optimizing for size.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
        PR target/106122
        * gcc.target/i386/pr106122.c: New test case.


Thanks in advance,
Roger
--


[-- Attachment #2: patchsp.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1017 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index 125a3b4..3b6f362 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -2588,7 +2588,8 @@
   "optimize_insn_for_size_p () && optimize_size > 1
    && operands[1] != const0_rtx
    && IN_RANGE (INTVAL (operands[1]), -128, 127)
-   && !ix86_red_zone_used"
+   && !ix86_red_zone_used
+   && REGNO (operands[0]) != SP_REG"
   [(set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 1))
    (set (match_dup 0) (match_dup 3))]
 {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106122.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106122.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d24ed3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr106122.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR middle-end/106122 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Oz" } */
+
+register volatile int a __asm__("%esp");
+void foo (void *);
+void bar (void *);
+
+void
+baz (void)
+{
+  foo (__builtin_return_address (0));
+  a = 0;
+  bar (__builtin_return_address (0));
+}

             reply	other threads:[~2022-06-30 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-30 23:00 Roger Sayle [this message]
2022-07-01  6:03 ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='008301d88cd5$2936ce90$7ba46bb0$@nextmovesoftware.com' \
    --to=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).