From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1268 invoked by alias); 15 May 2007 06:15:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 1258 invoked by uid 22791); 15 May 2007 06:15:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (HELO mail-out4.apple.com) (17.254.13.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 May 2007 06:15:18 +0000 Received: from relay5.apple.com (relay5.apple.com [17.128.113.35]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3F713CA5D; Mon, 14 May 2007 23:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay5.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay5.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id B915729C020; Mon, 14 May 2007 23:15:16 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807123-9e88abb0000065b6-d5-46494ff427e3 Received: from [17.219.198.106] (unknown [17.219.198.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay5.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 9240830400D; Mon, 14 May 2007 23:15:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200705150607.57354.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> References: <20070513180823.GA25352@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <3D8EA365-0D65-4964-97F4-B5CFD700ACBC@apple.com> <200705150607.57354.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <00FDBECC-A587-4B2B-8378-508940104772@apple.com> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Ian Lance Taylor , Daniel Jacobowitz , Zdenek Dvorak Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mike Stump Subject: Re: [patch] Move loop structures to gc memory Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 06:15:00 -0000 To: Steven Bosscher X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00939.txt.bz2 On May 14, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> We look forward to your contribution. > > Wait, wasn't it Apple who once promissed to speed up GCC 6 times by > looking into this issue? I don't recall that promise, maybe you have a quote handy? :-) We're about at 2x slower right now as I recall. I'd call that in the shooting match.