public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kyrylo Tkachov" <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Ramana Radhakrishnan" <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	"Richard Earnshaw" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH][ARM][1/3] Add vectorization support for rounding functions
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00fc01cdf27d$17a05630$46e10290$@tkachov@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <008401cdecc2$a2050160$e60f0420$@tkachov@arm.com>

Ping.

Thanks,
Kyrill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Kyrylo Tkachov
> Sent: 07 January 2013 10:35
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
> Subject: RE: [PATCH][ARM][1/3] Add vectorization support for rounding
> functions
> 
> Ping.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01111.html
> 
> Thanks,
> Kyrill
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-
> > owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Kyrylo Tkachov
> > Sent: 18 December 2012 13:33
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw
> > Subject: [PATCH][ARM][1/3] Add vectorization support for rounding
> > functions
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This patch does some refactoring by moving the definitions of the
> NEON
> > builtins to a separate file (arm_neon_builtins.def) and includes that
> > when
> > initialising the neon_builtin_data array and also during
> > the definition of enum arm_builtins (with appropriate redefinitions
> of
> > the
> > VAR* macros). This allows us to have symbolic names for the neon
> > builtins
> > that allows us to look up their declaration in
> > arm_builtin_decls. This is needed for vectorisation support in the
> next
> > patch. The ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE constant which was defined as part
> of
> > the
> > arm_builtins enum is now defined as a macro, since
> > various functions that deal with the initialisation and expansion of
> > builtins use it.
> >
> > No regressions on arm-none-eabi with model.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kyrill
> >
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog
> >
> > 2012-12-18  Kyrylo Tkachov  <kyrylo.tkachov at arm.com>
> >
> > 	* config/arm/arm_neon_builtins.def: New file.
> > 	* config/arm/arm.c (neon_builtin_data): Move contents to
> > 	  arm_neon_builtins.def.
> > 	  (enum arm_builtins): Include neon builtin definitions.
> > 	  (ARM_BUILTIN_NEON_BASE): Move from enum to macro.
> 
> 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-14 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-18 13:34 Kyrylo Tkachov
2013-01-07 10:35 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2013-01-14 17:32   ` Kyrylo Tkachov [this message]
2013-01-22 17:10     ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2013-02-05 14:10 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2013-02-06  9:57 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00fc01cdf27d$17a05630$46e10290$@tkachov@arm.com' \
    --to=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).