public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid -Wredundant-tags on a first declaration in use (PR 93824)
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:59:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <010f6d68-a64e-45a4-744e-c040a4ea94d6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f726a433-0bb9-33d4-9929-7c018913d0ca@gmail.com>

On 2/24/20 6:58 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> -Wredundant-tags doesn't consider type declarations that are also
> the first uses of the type, such as in 'void f (struct S);' and
> issues false positives for those.  According to the reported that's
> making it harder to use the warning to clean up LibreOffice.
> 
> The attached patch extends -Wredundant-tags to avoid these false
> positives by relying on the same class_decl_loc_t::class2loc mapping
> as -Wmismatched-tags.  The patch also somewhat improves the detection
> of both issues in template declarations (though more work is still
> needed there).

> +	     a new entry for it and return unless it's a declaration
> +	     involving a template that may need to be diagnosed by
> +	     -Wredundant-tags.  */
>  	  *rdl = class_decl_loc_t (class_key, false, def_p);
> -	  return;
> +	  if (TREE_CODE (decl) != TEMPLATE_DECL)
> +	    return;

How can the first appearance of a class template be redundant?

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-24 23:58 Martin Sebor
2020-02-28 16:59 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2020-02-28 17:45   ` Martin Sebor
2020-02-28 20:24     ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-09 16:31       ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-09 19:40         ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-09 21:39           ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-10  0:08             ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-11 16:57               ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-11 20:10                 ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-11 21:30                   ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-12 17:03                     ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-12 22:38                       ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-18 22:09                         ` [PING][PATCH] " Martin Sebor
2020-03-19  3:07                         ` [PATCH] " Jason Merrill
2020-03-19 23:55                           ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-20 21:53                             ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-21 21:59                               ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-23 14:49                                 ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-23 16:50                                   ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-26  5:36                                     ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-26 18:58                                       ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-26 22:16                                         ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-26 22:51                                           ` Martin Sebor
2020-03-27 16:33                                             ` Jason Merrill
2020-03-25 20:54                                 ` Martin Sebor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=010f6d68-a64e-45a4-744e-c040a4ea94d6@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).