It's weird. Could you give me the FAILs report?



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
Date: 2023-10-10 18:18
To: 钟居哲
CC: gcc-patches; Jeff Law; rdapp.gcc; kito.cheng
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH] RISC-V/testsuite: Enable `vect_pack_trunc'
On Mon, 9 Oct 2023, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
 
> > Btw, could you rebase to the trunk and run regression again?
> 
>  Full regression-testing takes roughly 40 hours here and I do not normally
> update the tree midway through my work so as not to add variables and end 
> up chasing a moving target, especially with such an unstable state that we 
> have ended up with recently with the RISC-V port.  Since I'm done with 
> this part I can refresh and schedule another run if you are curious as to 
> how it looks like from my side.  For the C subset alone it'll take less.
 
After 10 hours I have now got:
 
=== gcc Summary ===
 
# of expected passes 194576
# of unexpected failures 600
# of unexpected successes 11
# of expected failures 1631
# of unresolved testcases 120
# of unsupported tests 3828
 
as at commit cc5033721553 ("Fixes for profile count/probability 
maintenance"), which is slightly better, but still far from your 92 FAILs.  
NB I ran this testing with `--param=riscv-autovec-preference=scalable'; I 
guess I could have mentioned it.
 
  Maciej