From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: Incremental fix for g++.dg/gomp/for-21.C [PR84469]
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 16:38:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <029221ef-74ce-12a4-29f9-599bf4efaa20@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4X70nKAHnZLUNVa@tucnak>
On 11/29/22 07:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The PR84469 patch I've just posted regresses the for-21.C testcase,
> when in OpenMP loop there are at least 2 associated loops and
> in a template outer structured binding with non type dependent expression
> is used in the expressions of some inner loop, we don't diagnose those
> any longer, as the (weirdly worded) diagnostics was only done during
> finish_id_expression -> mark_used which for the inner loop expressions
> happens before the structured bindings are finalized. When in templates,
> mark_used doesn't diagnose uses of non-deduced variables, and if the
> range for expression is type dependent, it is similarly diagnosed during
> instantiation. But newly with the PR84469 fix if the range for expression
> is not type dependent, there is no place that would diagnose it, as during
> instantiation the structured bindings are already deduced.
>
> The following patch diagnoses it in that case during finish_omp_for (for
> consistency with the same weird message).
>
> I'll commit this to trunk if the other patch is approved and it passes
> bootstrap/regtest.
>
> 2022-11-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/84469
> * semantics.cc: Define INCLUDE_MEMORY before including system.h.
> (struct finish_omp_for_data): New type.
> (finish_omp_for_decomps_r): New function.
> (finish_omp_for): Diagnose uses of non-type-dependent range for
> loop decompositions in inner OpenMP associated loops in templates.
>
> * g++.dg/gomp/for-21.C (f6): Adjust lines of expected diagnostics.
> * g++.dg/gomp/for-22.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/cp/semantics.cc.jj 2022-11-19 09:21:14.897436616 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/semantics.cc 2022-11-29 12:58:36.165771985 +0100
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.
> <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
>
> #include "config.h"
> +#define INCLUDE_MEMORY
> #include "system.h"
> #include "coretypes.h"
> #include "target.h"
> @@ -10401,6 +10402,47 @@ handle_omp_for_class_iterator (int i, lo
> return false;
> }
>
> +struct finish_omp_for_data {
> + std::unique_ptr<hash_set<tree>> decomps;
> + bool fail;
> + location_t loc;
> +};
> +
> +/* Helper function for finish_omp_for. Diagnose uses of structured
> + bindings of OpenMP collapsed loop range for loops in the associated
> + loops. If not processing_template_decl, this is diagnosed by
> + finish_id_expression -> mark_used before the range for is deduced.
> + And if processing_template_decl and the range for expression is
> + type dependent, it is similarly diagnosed during instantiation.
> + Only when processing_template_decl and range for expression is
> + not type dependent, we wouldn't diagnose it at all, so do it
> + from finish_omp_for in that case. */
> +
> +static tree
> +finish_omp_for_decomps_r (tree *tp, int *, void *d)
> +{
> + if (VAR_P (*tp)
> + && DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P (*tp)
> + && !type_dependent_expression_p (*tp)
> + && DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (*tp))
> + {
> + tree v = DECL_VALUE_EXPR (*tp);
> + if (TREE_CODE (v) == ARRAY_REF
> + && VAR_P (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0))
> + && DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> + {
> + finish_omp_for_data *data = (finish_omp_for_data *) d;
> + if (data->decomps->contains (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)))
> + {
> + error_at (data->loc, "use of %qD before deduction of %<auto%>",
> + *tp);
> + data->fail = true;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return NULL_TREE;
> +}
> +
> /* Build and validate an OMP_FOR statement. CLAUSES, BODY, COND, INCR
> are directly for their associated operands in the statement. DECL
> and INIT are a combo; if DECL is NULL then INIT ought to be a
> @@ -10419,6 +10461,7 @@ finish_omp_for (location_t locus, enum t
> int i;
> int collapse = 1;
> int ordered = 0;
> + finish_omp_for_data data;
>
> gcc_assert (TREE_VEC_LENGTH (declv) == TREE_VEC_LENGTH (initv));
> gcc_assert (TREE_VEC_LENGTH (declv) == TREE_VEC_LENGTH (condv));
> @@ -10479,7 +10522,25 @@ finish_omp_for (location_t locus, enum t
> elocus = EXPR_LOCATION (init);
>
> if (cond == global_namespace)
> - continue;
> + {
> + gcc_assert (processing_template_decl);
> + if (TREE_VEC_LENGTH (declv) > 1
> + && VAR_P (decl)
> + && DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P (decl)
> + && !type_dependent_expression_p (decl))
> + {
> + gcc_assert (DECL_HAS_VALUE_EXPR_P (decl));
> + tree v = DECL_VALUE_EXPR (decl);
> + gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (v) == ARRAY_REF
> + && VAR_P (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0))
> + && DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0)));
> + if (!data.decomps)
> + data.decomps
> + = std::unique_ptr<hash_set<tree>> (new hash_set<tree>);
> + data.decomps->add (TREE_OPERAND (v, 0));
> + }
> + continue;
> + }
>
> if (cond == NULL)
> {
> @@ -10497,6 +10558,37 @@ finish_omp_for (location_t locus, enum t
> TREE_VEC_ELT (initv, i) = init;
> }
>
> + if (data.decomps)
> + {
> + data.fail = false;
> + data.loc = locus;
> + hash_set<tree> pset;
> + for (i = 0; i < TREE_VEC_LENGTH (declv); i++)
> + {
> + init = TREE_VEC_ELT (initv, i);
> + cond = TREE_VEC_ELT (condv, i);
> + incr = TREE_VEC_ELT (incrv, i);
> + data.loc = EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (init, locus);
> + cp_walk_tree (&init, finish_omp_for_decomps_r, &data, &pset);
> + data.loc = EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (cond, locus);
> + cp_walk_tree (&cond, finish_omp_for_decomps_r, &data, &pset);
> + data.loc = EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (incr, locus);
> + cp_walk_tree (&incr, finish_omp_for_decomps_r, &data, &pset);
> + }
> + if (orig_inits && !data.fail)
> + {
> + tree orig_init;
> + FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (*orig_inits, i, orig_init)
> + {
> + data.loc = EXPR_LOC_OR_LOC (orig_init, locus);
> + cp_walk_tree (&orig_init, finish_omp_for_decomps_r,
> + &data, &pset);
> + }
> + }
> + if (data.fail)
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> if (orig_inits)
> {
> bool fail = false;
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/for-21.C.jj 2020-01-12 11:54:37.178401867 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/for-21.C 2022-11-29 13:06:59.038410557 +0100
> @@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ void
> f6 (S (&a)[10])
> {
> #pragma omp for collapse (2)
> - for (auto [i, j, k] : a) // { dg-error "use of 'i' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
> + for (auto [i, j, k] : a) // { dg-error "use of 'i' before deduction of 'auto'" }
> for (int l = i; l < j; l += k) // { dg-error "use of 'j' before deduction of 'auto'" }
> - ; // { dg-error "use of 'k' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-3 }
> + ; // { dg-error "use of 'k' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
Hmm, this error is surprising: since the initializer is non-dependent,
we should have deduced immediately. I'd expect the same error as in the
non-structured-binding cases, "* expression refers to iteration variable".
> }
>
> template <typename T>
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/for-22.C.jj 2022-11-29 13:07:10.859237506 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/gomp/for-22.C 2022-11-29 13:09:50.743897003 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> +
> +namespace std {
> + template<typename T> struct tuple_size;
> + template<int, typename> struct tuple_element;
> +}
> +
> +struct A {
> + int i;
> + template <int I> int& get() { return i; }
> +};
> +
> +template<> struct std::tuple_size<A> { static const int value = 3; };
> +template<int I> struct std::tuple_element<I,A> { using type = int; };
> +
> +struct B {
> + A *begin();
> + A *end();
> +};
> +
> +void
> +f1 (B a)
> +{
> + #pragma omp for collapse (2)
> + for (auto [i, j, k] : a) // { dg-error "use of 'i' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .+1 }
> + for (int l = i; l < j; l += k) // { dg-error "use of 'j' before deduction of 'auto'" }
> + ; // { dg-error "use of 'k' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
> +}
> +
> +template <int N>
> +void
> +f2 (B a)
> +{
> + #pragma omp for collapse (2)
> + for (auto [i, j, k] : a) // { dg-error "use of 'i' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .+1 }
> + for (int l = i; l < j; l += k) // { dg-error "use of 'j' before deduction of 'auto'" }
> + ; // { dg-error "use of 'k' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
> +}
> +
> +template <typename T>
> +void
> +f3 (T a)
> +{
> + #pragma omp for collapse (2)
> + for (auto [i, j, k] : a) // { dg-error "use of 'i' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
> + for (int l = i; l < j; l += k) // { dg-error "use of 'j' before deduction of 'auto'" }
> + ; // { dg-error "use of 'k' before deduction of 'auto'" "" { target *-*-* } .-3 }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +test ()
> +{
> + B b;
> + f1 (b);
> + f2 <0> (b);
> + f3 <B> (b);
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-29 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 12:32 Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-29 21:38 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2022-11-29 22:05 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-30 15:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-30 18:52 ` Jason Merrill
2022-12-01 10:32 ` [PATCH] c++, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-12-01 18:21 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=029221ef-74ce-12a4-29f9-599bf4efaa20@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).