* [patch] tag ../include/*
@ 2014-10-07 16:37 Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-07 19:10 ` Mike Stump
2014-10-13 14:58 ` PING: " Aldy Hernandez
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2014-10-07 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 125 bytes --]
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
Thanks.
Aldy
[-- Attachment #2: curr --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]
commit a679529d14f005d8c88517f72d2b5295d8c82f0f
Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Oct 7 09:32:21 2014 -0700
* Makefile.in (TAGS): Tag ../include files.
diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index 97b439a..df43b9c 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -3772,6 +3772,7 @@ TAGS: lang.tags
fi; \
done; \
etags -o TAGS.sub c-family/*.h c-family/*.c *.h *.c *.cc \
+ ../include/*.h \
--language=none --regex="/\(char\|unsigned int\|int\|bool\|void\|HOST_WIDE_INT\|enum [A-Za-z_0-9]+\) [*]?\([A-Za-z_0-9]+\)/\2/" common.opt \
--language=none --regex="/\(DEF_RTL_EXPR\|DEFTREECODE\|DEFGSCODE\).*(\([A-Za-z_0-9]+\)/\2/" rtl.def tree.def gimple.def \
--language=none --regex="/DEFTIMEVAR (\([A-Za-z_0-9]+\)/\1/" timevar.def \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] tag ../include/*
2014-10-07 16:37 [patch] tag ../include/* Aldy Hernandez
@ 2014-10-07 19:10 ` Mike Stump
2014-10-13 14:58 ` PING: " Aldy Hernandez
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Stump @ 2014-10-07 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aldy Hernandez; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Oct 7, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files?
I don’t think there is.
> If not, could I please apply this patch?
I’m in favor.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*
2014-10-07 16:37 [patch] tag ../include/* Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-07 19:10 ` Mike Stump
@ 2014-10-13 14:58 ` Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-13 16:29 ` Jeff Law
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2014-10-13 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
> not, could I please apply this patch?
>
> Thanks.
> Aldy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*
2014-10-13 14:58 ` PING: " Aldy Hernandez
@ 2014-10-13 16:29 ` Jeff Law
2014-10-13 17:30 ` Aldy Hernandez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2014-10-13 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aldy Hernandez, gcc-patches
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> PING
>
> On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
>> not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*
2014-10-13 16:29 ` Jeff Law
@ 2014-10-13 17:30 ` Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-13 18:43 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2014-10-13 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Law, gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 326 bytes --]
On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> PING
>>
>> On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
>>> not, could I please apply this patch?
> ENOPATCH
>
> jeff
Sorry, patch was in original message. Attached here.
[-- Attachment #2: curr --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 816 bytes --]
commit a679529d14f005d8c88517f72d2b5295d8c82f0f
Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date: Tue Oct 7 09:32:21 2014 -0700
* Makefile.in (TAGS): Tag ../include files.
diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
index 97b439a..df43b9c 100644
--- a/gcc/Makefile.in
+++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
@@ -3772,6 +3772,7 @@ TAGS: lang.tags
fi; \
done; \
etags -o TAGS.sub c-family/*.h c-family/*.c *.h *.c *.cc \
+ ../include/*.h \
--language=none --regex="/\(char\|unsigned int\|int\|bool\|void\|HOST_WIDE_INT\|enum [A-Za-z_0-9]+\) [*]?\([A-Za-z_0-9]+\)/\2/" common.opt \
--language=none --regex="/\(DEF_RTL_EXPR\|DEFTREECODE\|DEFGSCODE\).*(\([A-Za-z_0-9]+\)/\2/" rtl.def tree.def gimple.def \
--language=none --regex="/DEFTIMEVAR (\([A-Za-z_0-9]+\)/\1/" timevar.def \
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: PING: Re: [patch] tag ../include/*
2014-10-13 17:30 ` Aldy Hernandez
@ 2014-10-13 18:43 ` Jeff Law
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2014-10-13 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aldy Hernandez, gcc-patches
On 10/13/14 11:29, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>> PING
>>>
>>> On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>>> Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
>>>> not, could I please apply this patch?
>> ENOPATCH
>>
>> jeff
>
> Sorry, patch was in original message. Attached here.
Ok for the trunk. Sorry it got dropped.
jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-10-13 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-10-07 16:37 [patch] tag ../include/* Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-07 19:10 ` Mike Stump
2014-10-13 14:58 ` PING: " Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-13 16:29 ` Jeff Law
2014-10-13 17:30 ` Aldy Hernandez
2014-10-13 18:43 ` Jeff Law
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).