Many thanks to H.J. for pointing out a better idiom for traversing the USEs (and also DEFs) of TImode registers in an instruction. This revised patched has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}, with no new failures. Ok for mainline? 2022-07-30 Roger Sayle H.J. Lu gcc/ChangeLog PR target/106450 * config/i386/i386-features.cc (timode_check_non_convertible_regs): Do nothing if REGNO is set in the REGS bitmap, or is a hard reg. (timode_remove_non_convertible_regs): Update comment. Call timode_check_non_convertible_reg on all TImode register DEFs and USEs in each instruction. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR target/106450 * gcc.target/i386/pr106450.c: New test case. Thanks (H.J. and Uros), Roger -- > -----Original Message----- > From: H.J. Lu > Sent: 28 July 2022 17:55 > To: Roger Sayle > Cc: GCC Patches > Subject: Re: [x86_64 PATCH] PR target/106450: Tweak > timode_remove_non_convertible_regs. > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 9:43 AM Roger Sayle > wrote: > > > > This patch resolves PR target/106450, some more fall-out from more > > aggressive TImode scalar-to-vector (STV) optimizations. I continue to > > be caught out by how far TImode STV has diverged from DImode/SImode > > STV, and therefore requires additional (unexpected) tweaking. Many > > thanks to H.J. Lu for pointing out timode_remove_non_convertible_regs > > needs to be extended to handle XOR (and other new operations). > > > > Unhelpfully the comment above this function states that it's the > > TImode version of "remove_non_convertible_regs", which doesn't exist > > anymore, so I've resurrected an explanatory comment from the git history. > > By refactoring the checks for hard regs and already "marked" regs into > > timode_check_non_convertible_regs itself, all its callers are > > simplified. This patch then uses GET_RTX_CLASS to generically handle > > unary and binary operations, calling timode_check_non_convertible_regs > > on each TImode register operand in the single_set's SET_SRC. > > > > This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap > > and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}, > > with no new failures. Ok for mainline? > > > > > > 2022-07-28 Roger Sayle > > > > gcc/ChangeLog > > PR target/106450 > > * config/i386/i386-features.cc (timode_check_non_convertible_regs): > > Do nothing if REGNO is set in the REGS bitmap, or is a hard reg. > > (timode_remove_non_convertible_regs): Update comment. > > Call timode_check_non_convertible_regs on all register operands > > of supported (binary and unary) operations. > > Should we use > > df_ref ref; > FOR_EACH_INSN_USE (ref, insn) > if (!DF_REF_REG_MEM_P (ref)) > timode_check_non_convertible_regs (candidates, regs, > DF_REF_REGNO (ref)); > > to check each use? > > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > PR target/106450 > > * gcc.target/i386/pr106450.c: New test case. > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Roger > > -- > -- > H.J.