From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@xry111.site>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366A33857B82
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon,  4 Jul 2022 06:55:48 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 366A33857B82
Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest
 SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
 by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4750366787;
 Mon,  4 Jul 2022 02:55:44 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <050aba0b4a698383f3c3a8d3ba786521d5947a00.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loongarch: use -mno-check-zero-division as the default
 for optimized code
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, GCC Patches
 <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Chenghua Xu <xuchenghua@loongson.cn>, Weining Lu
 <luweining@loongson.cn>, Wang Xuerui <i@xen0n.name>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 14:55:42 +0800
In-Reply-To: <d44bc063-c5d2-a87d-93f4-3e6c2c22c489@loongson.cn>
References: <cffdc896d5243ba72e33c842ec0af93b10a70726.camel@xry111.site>
 <CAFiYyc2CEAwPfk0=0f4c+f380qiPuHy+DOeqh1zCtVh1Lp4ZoA@mail.gmail.com>
 <03929777-80a0-dcc1-3e04-9811583eebd3@loongson.cn>
 <311645282e42983004bb8f39e53ea4211e066285.camel@xry111.site>
 <e6737e48-ffed-5d41-fc89-835726c33387@loongson.cn>
 <047d4b06093d085c2fdb96e618469d3630e953dc.camel@xry111.site>
 <d44bc063-c5d2-a87d-93f4-3e6c2c22c489@loongson.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,
 LIKELY_SPAM_FROM, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 06:55:49 -0000

On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 14:25 +0800, Lulu Cheng wrote:

> > How do you think about the suggestion from Richard about a backport int=
o
> > gcc-12 branch?=C2=A0 Normally we don't backport behavior changes, but m=
aking
> > 12.1 the only exception seems compelling.
>=20
> I agree with you and Richard.
>=20
> Thanks!

Pushed r12-8546.  wwwdocs patch preparing.