From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-270173-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31137 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2010 04:08:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 31125 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2010 04:08:52 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.32)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:08:45 +0000
Received: from omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36])	by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id sSFo1e0020mlR8UA3U8kdA; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:08:44 +0000
Received: from c-98-210-246-208.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([98.210.246.208])	by omta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id sU8j1e0024WWjWi8XU8jGK; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:08:43 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: support board_info timeouts
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <201008100348.o7A3mVG7009468@greed.delorie.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:09:00 -0000
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <0594E5C8-2B3E-409F-957D-3CF406B7D6F5@comcast.net>
References: <201008100348.o7A3mVG7009468@greed.delorie.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00719.txt.bz2

n Aug 9, 2010, at 8:48 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Is there any reason why we don't support board-level timeouts?

I don't know of any...  If it helps you, I'd say, lets put it in...