From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31800 invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2017 17:05:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31136 invoked by uid 89); 12 Oct 2017 17:05:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:05:24 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43A8685543 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:05:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 43A8685543 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=vmakarov@redhat.com Received: from [10.10.123.200] (ovpn-123-200.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.123.200]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA56417AD6; Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: patch to fix PR82353 To: Jakub Jelinek References: <20171011211106.GQ14653@tucnak> <20171012164921.GY14653@tucnak> Cc: gcc-patches From: Vladimir Makarov Message-ID: <0700d384-c580-efd3-e1b5-f7aac40d92c9@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:11:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20171012164921.GY14653@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00772.txt.bz2 On 10/12/2017 12:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 06:41:05PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >>> Tested on x86_64-linux -m32/-m64, and verified with cc1plus before your >>> change, ok for trunk? > BTW, I think it is quite fragile to scan for the reload messages, so I've > cooked up a runtime test that fails before your patch and succeeds with your > patch. Tested on x86_64-linux with -m32/-m64 (both with your patch reverted > and without), ok for trunk? > > OK. FYI, I am going to revert LRA part of the patch because it results in a failure bootstrap with go or ada. I guess the new version of the patch will be ready tomorrow or on Monday.