public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: Yujie Yang <yangyujie@loongson.cn>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, xuchenghua@loongson.cn,
	panchenghui@loongson.cn,  chenglulu@loongson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] LoongArch: improved target configuration interface
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:49:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0733349c1d233eb845a26d9992a1f83b8a2e7a7a.camel@xry111.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814084404.a62t2odnjzqhtofg@loongson-pc>

On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:44 +0800, Yujie Yang wrote:
> I assume we all want:
> 
>  (1) -mlasx -mlsx -> enable LSX and LASX
>  (2) -mlasx -mno-lsx -> disable LSX and LASX
>  (3) -mno-lsx -mlasx -> enable LSX and LASX

Yes.

> Unless we declare -mlsx / -mlasx as driver deferred, AFAIK there is no other way for
> us to know the actual order of appearnce of all -m[no-]l[a]sx options on the command
> line.  All we know from GCC's option system would be a final on/off state of "lsx"
> and a final on/off state of "lasx".

But x86 does this correct;

$ echo __AVX__ + __AVX2__ | LANG= cpp -E -mno-avx -mavx2
# 0 "<stdin>"
# 0 "<built-in>"
# 0 "<command-line>"
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 0 "<command-line>" 2
# 1 "<stdin>"
1 + 1

so there must be a way to handle this...

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-14  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-14  3:57 [PATCH v1 1/6] LoongArch: a symmetric multilib subdir layout Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  3:57 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] LoongArch: improved target configuration interface Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  5:22   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-15  1:12     ` Yujie Yang
2023-08-14  5:29   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  5:58   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  6:01     ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  8:44     ` Yujie Yang
2023-08-14  8:49       ` Xi Ruoyao [this message]
2023-08-14  8:57         ` Yujie Yang
2023-08-14  8:58           ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-09-06  6:43   ` Richard Sandiford
2023-09-06  6:54     ` Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  3:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] LoongArch: define preprocessing macros "__loongarch_{arch,tune}" Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  5:24   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  3:57 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] LoongArch: use -mstrict-align by default when building libraries Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  5:18   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  3:57 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] LoongArch: export headers for building GCC plugins Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  3:57 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] LoongArch: support loongarch*-elf target Yang Yujie
2023-08-14  5:38 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] LoongArch: a symmetric multilib subdir layout Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  5:40   ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14  7:37   ` Yujie Yang
2023-08-14  7:48     ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-14 10:18       ` Yujie Yang
2023-08-14 11:16         ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-15  1:29           ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-08-15  2:32             ` Yujie Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0733349c1d233eb845a26d9992a1f83b8a2e7a7a.camel@xry111.site \
    --to=xry111@xry111.site \
    --cc=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=panchenghui@loongson.cn \
    --cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
    --cc=yangyujie@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).