public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: generic targs and identity substitution [PR105956]
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 16:29:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <07a63134-41bb-4467-57b3-59d514940fb7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bc79bbc-bbe5-e8c9-2d09-ff02308ec754@idea>

On 7/5/22 10:06, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 
>> On 6/29/22 13:42, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>> In r13-1045-gcb7fd1ea85feea I assumed that substitution into generic
>>> DECL_TI_ARGS corresponds to an identity mapping of the given arguments,
>>> and hence its safe to always elide such substitution.  But this PR
>>> demonstrates that such a substitution isn't always the identity mapping,
>>> in particular when there's an ARGUMENT_PACK_SELECT argument, which gets
>>> handled specially during substitution:
>>>
>>>     * when substituting an APS into a template parameter, we strip the
>>>       APS to its underlying argument;
>>>     * and when substituting an APS into a pack expansion, we strip the
>>>       APS to its underlying argument pack.
>>
>> Ah, right.  For instance, in variadic96.C we have
>>
>>      10	template < typename... T >
>>      11	struct derived
>>      12	  : public base< T, derived< T... > >...
>>
>> so when substituting into the base-specifier, we're approaching it from the
>> outside in, so when we get to the inner T... we need some way to find the T
>> pack again.  It might be possible to remove the need for APS by substituting
>> inner pack expansions before outer ones, which could improve worst-case
>> complexity, but I don't know how relevant that is in real code; I imagine most
>> inner pack expansions are as simple as this one.
> 
> Aha, that makes sense.
> 
>>
>>> In this testcase, when expanding the pack expansion pattern (idx + Ns)...
>>> with Ns={0,1}, we specialize idx twice, first with Ns=APS<0,{0,1}> and
>>> then Ns=APS<1,{0,1}>.  The DECL_TI_ARGS of idx are the generic template
>>> arguments of the enclosing class template impl, so before r13-1045,
>>> we'd substitute into its DECL_TI_ARGS which gave Ns={0,1} as desired.
>>> But after r13-1045, we elide this substitution and end up attempting to
>>> hash the original Ns argument, an APS, which ICEs.
>>>
>>> So this patch partially reverts this part of r13-1045.  I considered
>>> using preserve_args in this case instead, but that'd break the
>>> static_assert in the testcase because preserve_args always strips APS to
>>> its underlying argument, but here we want to strip it to its underlying
>>> argument pack, so we'd incorrectly end up forming the specializations
>>> impl<0>::idx and impl<1>::idx instead of impl<0,1>::idx.
>>>
>>> Although we can't elide the substitution into DECL_TI_ARGS in light of
>>> ARGUMENT_PACK_SELECT, it should still be safe to elide template argument
>>> coercion in the case of a non-template decl, which this patch preserves.
>>>
>>> It's unfortunate that we need to remove this optimization just because
>>> it doesn't hold for one special tree code.  So this patch implements a
>>> heuristic in tsubst_template_args to avoid allocating a new TREE_VEC if
>>> the substituted elements are identical to those of a level from ARGS.
>>> It turns out that about 30% of all calls to tsubst_template_args benefit
>>> from this optimization, and it reduces memory usage by about 1.5% for
>>> e.g. stdc++.h (relative to r13-1045).  (This is the maybe_reuse stuff,
>>> the rest of the changes to tsubst_template_args are just drive-by
>>> cleanups.)
>>>
>>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
>>> trunk?  Patch generated with -w to ignore noisy whitespace changes.
>>>
>>> 	PR c++/105956
>>>
>>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	* pt.cc (tsubst_template_args): Move variable declarations
>>> 	closer to their first use.  Replace 'orig_t' with 'r'.  Rename
>>> 	'need_new' to 'const_subst_p'.  Heuristically detect if the
>>> 	substituted elements are identical to that of a level from
>>> 	'args' and avoid allocating a new TREE_VEC if so.
>>> 	(tsubst_decl) <case TYPE_DECL, case VAR_DECL>: Revert
>>> 	r13-1045-gcb7fd1ea85feea change for avoiding substitution into
>>> 	DECL_TI_ARGS, but still avoid coercion in this case.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	* g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C: New test.
>>> ---
>>>    gcc/cp/pt.cc                             | 113 ++++++++++++++---------
>>>    gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C |  14 +++
>>>    2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>>>    create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>>> index 8672da123f4..7898834faa6 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>>>         Fixed by: C++20 modules.  */
>>>      #include "config.h"
>>> +#define INCLUDE_ALGORITHM // for std::equal
>>>    #include "system.h"
>>>    #include "coretypes.h"
>>>    #include "cp-tree.h"
>>> @@ -13544,17 +13545,22 @@ tsubst_argument_pack (tree orig_arg, tree args,
>>> tsubst_flags_t complain,
>>>    tree
>>>    tsubst_template_args (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, tree
>>> in_decl)
>>>    {
>>> -  tree orig_t = t;
>>> -  int len, need_new = 0, i, expanded_len_adjust = 0, out;
>>> -  tree *elts;
>>> -
>>>      if (t == error_mark_node)
>>>        return error_mark_node;
>>>    -  len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (t);
>>> -  elts = XALLOCAVEC (tree, len);
>>> +  const int len = TREE_VEC_LENGTH (t);
>>> +  tree *elts = XALLOCAVEC (tree, len);
>>> +  int expanded_len_adjust = 0;
>>>    -  for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>>> +  /* True iff no element of T was changed by the substitution.  */
>>> +  bool const_subst_p = true;
>>> +
>>> +  /* If MAYBE_REUSE is non-NULL, as an optimization we'll try to reuse and
>>> +     return this TREE_VEC instead of allocating a new one if possible.
>>> This
>>> +     will either be ARGS or a level from ARGS.  */
>>> +  tree maybe_reuse = NULL_TREE;
>>> +
>>> +  for (int i = 0; i < len; i++)
>>>        {
>>>          tree orig_arg = TREE_VEC_ELT (t, i);
>>>          tree new_arg;
>>> @@ -13580,56 +13586,90 @@ tsubst_template_args (tree t, tree args,
>>> tsubst_flags_t complain, tree in_decl)
>>>          else if (ARGUMENT_PACK_P (orig_arg))
>>>    	new_arg = tsubst_argument_pack (orig_arg, args, complain, in_decl);
>>>          else
>>> +	{
>>>    	  new_arg = tsubst_template_arg (orig_arg, args, complain, in_decl);
>>>    +	  /* If T heuristically appears to be a set of generic template
>>> +	     arguments, set MAYBE_REUSE to the corresponding level from
>>> +	     ARGS.  */
>>> +	  if (maybe_reuse == NULL_TREE && orig_arg != NULL_TREE)
>>> +	    {
>>> +	      if (TEMPLATE_PARM_P (orig_arg))
>>> +		{
>>
>> This doesn't handle the case of variadic template parameters, which are
>> represented in the generic args with a pack expansion.  If this is a choice,
>> there should be a comment about it.
> 
> AFAICT substituting such a pack expansion will never be an identity
> transform -- the relevant targ during tsubst_pack_expansion will be an
> ARGUMENT_PACK, and we'll return the TREE_VEC from that ARGUMENT_PACK
> instead of the ARGUMENT_PACK itself, so there's no way we can reuse (a
> level from) 'args' in this case.

Hmm, when replacing a level of T... we start with a TREE_VEC containing 
an ARGUMENT_PACK around a TREE_VEC containing a PACK_EXPANSION, and 
substitution should replace that with the argument level, a TREE_VEC 
containing an ARGUMENT_PACK around a TREE_VEC containing an actual set 
of args, so reuse ought to be possible?

> So variadic template parameters act as
> an optimization barrier here unfortunately.  I can add a comment to that
> effect, and perhaps explicitly give up in this case by also setting
> maybe_reuse to error_mark_node in the PACK_EXPANSION_P branch of
> tsubst_template_args?
> 
>>
>>> +		  int level, index;\f
>>> +		  template_parm_level_and_index (orig_arg, &level, &index);
>>> +		  if (index == i && TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) >= level)
>>> +		    maybe_reuse = TMPL_ARGS_LEVEL (args, level);
>>> +		  else
>>> +		    maybe_reuse = error_mark_node;
>>> +		}
>>> +	      else
>>> +		/* T is not a set of generic template arguments; use
>>> +		   error_mark_node to denote this.  */
>>> +		maybe_reuse = error_mark_node;
>>> +	    }
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>>          if (new_arg == error_mark_node)
>>>    	return error_mark_node;
>>>            elts[i] = new_arg;
>>>          if (new_arg != orig_arg)
>>> -	need_new = 1;
>>> +	const_subst_p = false;
>>>        }
>>>    -  if (!need_new)
>>> +  if (const_subst_p)
>>>        return t;
>>>    +  /* If ARGS and T are both multi-level, then substituted T may be
>>> +     identical to ARGS (if each level was pairwise identical).  */
>>> +  if (maybe_reuse == NULL_TREE
>>> +      && TMPL_ARGS_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LEVELS (t)
>>> +      && TMPL_ARGS_HAVE_MULTIPLE_LEVELS (args))
>>> +    maybe_reuse = args;
>>> +
>>> +  /* Return MAYBE_REUSE and avoid allocating a new TREE_VEC if the
>>> substituted
>>> +     result is identical to it.  */
>>> +  if (NON_ERROR (maybe_reuse) != NULL_TREE
>>> +      && TREE_VEC_LENGTH (maybe_reuse) == len
>>> +      && std::equal (elts, elts+len, TREE_VEC_BEGIN (maybe_reuse)))
>>> +    return maybe_reuse;
>>> +
>>>      /* Make space for the expanded arguments coming from template
>>>         argument packs.  */
>>> -  t = make_tree_vec (len + expanded_len_adjust);
>>> -  /* ORIG_T can contain TREE_VECs. That happens if ORIG_T contains the
>>> +  tree r = make_tree_vec (len + expanded_len_adjust);
>>> +  /* T can contain TREE_VECs. That happens if T contains the
>>>         arguments for a member template.
>>> -     In that case each TREE_VEC in ORIG_T represents a level of template
>>> -     arguments, and ORIG_T won't carry any non defaulted argument count.
>>> +     In that case each TREE_VEC in T represents a level of template
>>> +     arguments, and T won't carry any non defaulted argument count.
>>>         It will rather be the nested TREE_VECs that will carry one.
>>> -     In other words, ORIG_T carries a non defaulted argument count only
>>> +     In other words, T carries a non defaulted argument count only
>>>         if it doesn't contain any nested TREE_VEC.  */
>>> -  if (NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (orig_t))
>>> +  if (NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (t))
>>>        {
>>> -      int count = GET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (orig_t);
>>> +      int count = GET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (t);
>>>          count += expanded_len_adjust;
>>> -      SET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (t, count);
>>> +      SET_NON_DEFAULT_TEMPLATE_ARGS_COUNT (r, count);
>>>        }
>>> -  for (i = 0, out = 0; i < len; i++)
>>> +  for (int i = 0, out = 0; i < len; i++)
>>>        {
>>> -      tree orig_arg = TREE_VEC_ELT (orig_t, i);
>>> +      tree orig_arg = TREE_VEC_ELT (t, i);
>>>          if (orig_arg
>>>    	  && (PACK_EXPANSION_P (orig_arg) || ARGUMENT_PACK_P (orig_arg))
>>>              && TREE_CODE (elts[i]) == TREE_VEC)
>>>            {
>>> -          int idx;
>>> -
>>>              /* Now expand the template argument pack "in place".  */
>>> -          for (idx = 0; idx < TREE_VEC_LENGTH (elts[i]); idx++, out++)
>>> -            TREE_VEC_ELT (t, out) = TREE_VEC_ELT (elts[i], idx);
>>> +	  for (int idx = 0; idx < TREE_VEC_LENGTH (elts[i]); idx++, out++)
>>> +	    TREE_VEC_ELT (r, out) = TREE_VEC_ELT (elts[i], idx);
>>>            }
>>>          else
>>>            {
>>> -          TREE_VEC_ELT (t, out) = elts[i];
>>> +	  TREE_VEC_ELT (r, out) = elts[i];
>>>              out++;
>>>            }
>>>        }
>>>    -  return t;
>>> +  return r;
>>>    }
>>>      /* Substitute ARGS into one level PARMS of template parameters.  */
>>> @@ -14965,32 +15005,21 @@ tsubst_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t
>>> complain)
>>>      	    if (!spec)
>>>    	      {
>>> -		int args_depth = TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args);
>>> -		int parms_depth = TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (DECL_TI_ARGS (t));
>>>    		tmpl = DECL_TI_TEMPLATE (t);
>>>    		gen_tmpl = most_general_template (tmpl);
>>> -		if (args_depth == parms_depth
>>> -		    && !PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl))
>>> -		  /* The DECL_TI_ARGS in this case are the generic template
>>> -		     arguments for the enclosing class template, so we can
>>> -		     shortcut substitution (which would just be the identity
>>> -		     mapping).  */
>>> -		  argvec = args;
>>> -		else
>>> -		  {
>>>    		argvec = tsubst (DECL_TI_ARGS (t), args, complain, in_decl);
>>> -		    /* Coerce the innermost arguments again if necessary.  If
>>> -		       there's fewer levels of args than of parms, then the
>>> -		       substitution could not have changed the innermost args
>>> -		       (modulo level lowering).  */
>>> -		    if (args_depth >= parms_depth && argvec !=
>>> error_mark_node)
>>> +		if (argvec != error_mark_node
>>> +		    && PRIMARY_TEMPLATE_P (gen_tmpl)
>>> +		    && TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (args) >= TMPL_ARGS_DEPTH (argvec))
>>> +		    /* We're fully specializing a template declaration, so
>>> +		       we need to coerce the innermost arguments corresponding
>>> +		       to the template.  */
>>>    		    argvec = (coerce_innermost_template_parms
>>>    			      (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARMS (gen_tmpl),
>>>    			       argvec, t, complain,
>>>    			       /*all*/true, /*defarg*/true));
>>>    		if (argvec == error_mark_node)
>>>    		  RETURN (error_mark_node);
>>> -		  }
>>>    		hash = spec_hasher::hash (gen_tmpl, argvec);
>>>    		spec = retrieve_specialization (gen_tmpl, argvec, hash);
>>>    	      }
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C
>>> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..3938e52e0e7
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic183.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>>> +// PR c++/105956
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
>>> +
>>> +template<int... Ns> struct list;
>>> +
>>> +template<int... Ns> struct impl {
>>> +  static const int idx = 0;
>>> +  using type = list<(idx + Ns)...>;
>>> +
>>> +  static constexpr const int* a[2] = {(Ns, &idx)...};
>>> +  static_assert(a[0] == &idx && a[1] == &idx, "");
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +template struct impl<0, 1>;
>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-05 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-29 17:42 Patrick Palka
2022-07-01 22:44 ` Jason Merrill
2022-07-05 14:06   ` Patrick Palka
2022-07-05 20:29     ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2022-07-06 19:26       ` Patrick Palka
2022-07-07  5:00         ` Jason Merrill
2022-07-07 15:16           ` Patrick Palka
2022-07-07 17:15             ` Patrick Palka
2022-07-07 18:58             ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=07a63134-41bb-4467-57b3-59d514940fb7@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).