From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve profile handling in switch lowering.
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 16:00:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07de3a4b-0250-fbee-dbe6-db16728a0e27@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8fbd09b-9e2a-7988-98f2-bcb295f464e5@suse.cz>
PING^3
On 3/24/22 11:22, Martin Liška wrote:
> PING^2
>
> On 3/4/22 14:47, Martin Liška wrote:
>> PING^1
>>
>> On 1/26/22 12:11, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Right now, switch lowering does not update basic_block::count values
>>> so that they are uninitiliazed. Moreover, I've updated probability scaling
>>> when a more complex expansion happens. There are still some situations where
>>> the profile is a bit imprecise, but the patch improves rapidly the current situation.
>>>
>>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>>>
>>> Ready to be installed?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> PR tree-optimization/101301
>>> PR tree-optimization/103680
>>>
>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> * tree-switch-conversion.cc (bit_test_cluster::emit):
>>> Handle correctly remaining probability.
>>> (switch_decision_tree::try_switch_expansion): Fix BB's count
>>> where a cluster expansion happens.
>>> (switch_decision_tree::emit_cmp_and_jump_insns): Fill up also
>>> BB count.
>>> (switch_decision_tree::do_jump_if_equal): Likewise.
>>> (switch_decision_tree::emit_case_nodes): Handle special case
>>> for BT expansion which can also fallback to a default BB.
>>> * tree-switch-conversion.h (cluster::cluster): Add
>>> m_default_prob probability.
>>> ---
>>> gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>> gcc/tree-switch-conversion.h | 8 +++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
>>> index 670397c87e4..d6679e8dee3 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.cc
>>> @@ -1538,10 +1538,12 @@ bit_test_cluster::emit (tree index_expr, tree index_type,
>>> test[k].target_bb = n->m_case_bb;
>>> test[k].label = n->m_case_label_expr;
>>> test[k].bits = 0;
>>> + test[k].prob = profile_probability::never ();
>>> count++;
>>> }
>>>
>>> test[k].bits += n->get_range (n->get_low (), n->get_high ());
>>> + test[k].prob += n->m_prob;
>>>
>>> lo = tree_to_uhwi (int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, n->get_low (), minval));
>>> if (n->get_high () == NULL_TREE)
>>> @@ -1629,6 +1631,11 @@ bit_test_cluster::emit (tree index_expr, tree index_type,
>>> /*simple=*/true, NULL_TREE,
>>> /*before=*/true, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>>>
>>> + profile_probability subtree_prob = m_subtree_prob;
>>> + profile_probability default_prob = m_default_prob;
>>> + if (!default_prob.initialized_p ())
>>> + default_prob = m_subtree_prob.invert ();
>>> +
>>> if (m_handles_entire_switch && entry_test_needed)
>>> {
>>> tree range = int_const_binop (MINUS_EXPR, maxval, minval);
>>> @@ -1639,9 +1646,10 @@ bit_test_cluster::emit (tree index_expr, tree index_type,
>>> /*simple=*/true, NULL_TREE,
>>> /*before=*/true, GSI_SAME_STMT);
>>> tmp = fold_build2 (GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, idx, range);
>>> + default_prob = default_prob.apply_scale (1, 2);
>>> basic_block new_bb
>>> = hoist_edge_and_branch_if_true (&gsi, tmp, default_bb,
>>> - profile_probability::unlikely ());
>>> + default_prob);
>>> gsi = gsi_last_bb (new_bb);
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -1662,14 +1670,12 @@ bit_test_cluster::emit (tree index_expr, tree index_type,
>>> else
>>> csui = tmp;
>>>
>>> - profile_probability prob = profile_probability::always ();
>>> -
>>> /* for each unique set of cases:
>>> if (const & csui) goto target */
>>> for (k = 0; k < count; k++)
>>> {
>>> - prob = profile_probability::always ().apply_scale (test[k].bits,
>>> - bt_range);
>>> + profile_probability prob = test[k].prob / (subtree_prob + default_prob);
>>> + subtree_prob -= test[k].prob;
>>> bt_range -= test[k].bits;
>>> tmp = wide_int_to_tree (word_type_node, test[k].mask);
>>> tmp = fold_build2 (BIT_AND_EXPR, word_type_node, csui, tmp);
>>> @@ -1908,9 +1914,13 @@ switch_decision_tree::try_switch_expansion (vec<cluster *> &clusters)
>>> /* Emit cluster-specific switch handling. */
>>> for (unsigned i = 0; i < clusters.length (); i++)
>>> if (clusters[i]->get_type () != SIMPLE_CASE)
>>> - clusters[i]->emit (index_expr, index_type,
>>> - gimple_switch_default_label (m_switch),
>>> - m_default_bb, gimple_location (m_switch));
>>> + {
>>> + edge e = single_pred_edge (clusters[i]->m_case_bb);
>>> + e->dest->count = e->src->count.apply_probability (e->probability);
>>> + clusters[i]->emit (index_expr, index_type,
>>> + gimple_switch_default_label (m_switch),
>>> + m_default_bb, gimple_location (m_switch));
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> fix_phi_operands_for_edges ();
>>> @@ -2162,6 +2172,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (basic_block bb, tree op0,
>>> edge false_edge = split_block (bb, cond);
>>> false_edge->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
>>> false_edge->probability = prob.invert ();
>>> + false_edge->dest->count = bb->count.apply_probability (prob.invert ());
>>>
>>> edge true_edge = make_edge (bb, label_bb, EDGE_TRUE_VALUE);
>>> true_edge->probability = prob;
>>> @@ -2192,6 +2203,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::do_jump_if_equal (basic_block bb, tree op0, tree op1,
>>> edge false_edge = split_block (bb, cond);
>>> false_edge->flags = EDGE_FALSE_VALUE;
>>> false_edge->probability = prob.invert ();
>>> + false_edge->dest->count = bb->count.apply_probability (prob.invert ());
>>>
>>> edge true_edge = make_edge (bb, label_bb, EDGE_TRUE_VALUE);
>>> true_edge->probability = prob;
>>> @@ -2227,7 +2239,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::emit_case_nodes (basic_block bb, tree index,
>>> node->m_c->m_case_bb, p, loc);
>>> /* Since this case is taken at this point, reduce its weight from
>>> subtree_weight. */
>>> - node->m_c->m_subtree_prob -= p;
>>> + node->m_c->m_subtree_prob -= node->m_c->m_prob;
>>>
>>> if (node->m_left != NULL && node->m_right != NULL)
>>> {
>>> @@ -2246,6 +2258,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::emit_case_nodes (basic_block bb, tree index,
>>> / (node->m_c->m_subtree_prob + default_prob));
>>> bb = do_jump_if_equal (bb, index, node->m_right->m_c->get_low (),
>>> node->m_right->m_c->m_case_bb, p, loc);
>>> + node->m_c->m_subtree_prob -= node->m_right->m_c->m_prob;
>>>
>>> p = (node->m_left->m_c->m_prob
>>> / (node->m_c->m_subtree_prob + default_prob));
>>> @@ -2262,6 +2275,7 @@ switch_decision_tree::emit_case_nodes (basic_block bb, tree index,
>>> p = ((node->m_right->m_c->m_subtree_prob
>>> + default_prob.apply_scale (1, 2))
>>> / (node->m_c->m_subtree_prob + default_prob));
>>> + test_bb->count = bb->count.apply_probability (p);
>>> bb = emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (bb, index, node->m_c->get_high (),
>>> GT_EXPR, test_bb, p, loc);
>>> default_prob = default_prob.apply_scale (1, 2);
>>> @@ -2348,21 +2362,28 @@ switch_decision_tree::emit_case_nodes (basic_block bb, tree index,
>>> is the one to branch to. */
>>> if (node->has_child () || node->m_c->get_type () != SIMPLE_CASE)
>>> {
>>> + bool is_bt = node->m_c->get_type () == BIT_TEST;
>>> + int parts = is_bt ? 3 : 2;
>>> +
>>> /* Branch to a label where we will handle it later. */
>>> basic_block test_bb = split_edge (single_succ_edge (bb));
>>> redirect_edge_succ (single_pred_edge (test_bb),
>>> single_succ_edge (bb)->dest);
>>>
>>> -
>>> - profile_probability right_prob = profile_probability::never ();
>>> - if (node->m_right)
>>> - right_prob = node->m_right->m_c->m_subtree_prob;
>>> - p = ((right_prob + default_prob.apply_scale (1, 2))
>>> + profile_probability right_prob = profile_probability::never ();
>>> + if (node->m_right)
>>> + right_prob = node->m_right->m_c->m_subtree_prob;
>>> + p = ((right_prob + default_prob.apply_scale (1, parts))
>>> / (node->m_c->m_subtree_prob + default_prob));
>>> + test_bb->count = bb->count.apply_probability (p);
>>>
>>> bb = emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (bb, index, node->m_c->get_high (),
>>> GT_EXPR, test_bb, p, loc);
>>> - default_prob = default_prob.apply_scale (1, 2);
>>> +
>>> + default_prob = default_prob.apply_scale (1, parts);
>>> + node->m_c->m_subtree_prob -= right_prob;
>>> + if (is_bt)
>>> + node->m_c->m_default_prob = default_prob;
>>>
>>> /* Value belongs to this node or to the left-hand subtree. */
>>> p = node->m_c->m_prob / (node->m_c->m_subtree_prob + default_prob);
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.h b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.h
>>> index e969c051a05..5f3f99353ba 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.h
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree-switch-conversion.h
>>> @@ -102,6 +102,10 @@ public:
>>> /* Probability of reaching subtree rooted at this node. */
>>> profile_probability m_subtree_prob;
>>>
>>> + /* Probability of default case when reaching the node.
>>> + It is used by bit-test right now. */
>>> + profile_probability m_default_prob;
>>> +
>>> protected:
>>> /* Default constructor. */
>>> cluster () {}
>>> @@ -110,7 +114,8 @@ protected:
>>> cluster::cluster (tree case_label_expr, basic_block case_bb,
>>> profile_probability prob, profile_probability subtree_prob):
>>> m_case_label_expr (case_label_expr), m_case_bb (case_bb), m_prob (prob),
>>> - m_subtree_prob (subtree_prob)
>>> + m_subtree_prob (subtree_prob),
>>> + m_default_prob (profile_probability::uninitialized ())
>>> {
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -542,6 +547,7 @@ public:
>>> basic_block target_bb;
>>> tree label;
>>> int bits;
>>> + profile_probability prob;
>>>
>>> /* Comparison function for qsort to order bit tests by decreasing
>>> probability of execution. */
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-26 11:11 Martin Liška
2022-03-04 13:47 ` Martin Liška
2022-03-24 10:22 ` Martin Liška
2022-04-07 14:00 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2022-11-28 9:53 ` Martin Liška
2022-11-28 17:38 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07de3a4b-0250-fbee-dbe6-db16728a0e27@suse.cz \
--to=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).