From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12461 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2015 20:47:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12439 invoked by uid 89); 2 Jan 2015 20:47:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.162) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 20:47:35 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-18v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.242]) by resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id b8mj1p0025E3ZMc018nYra; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 20:47:32 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d]) by resomta-po-18v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id b8nV1p00g2ztT3H018nWum; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 20:47:31 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran + Testsuite] Fix coarray handling in modules From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <54A680CA.90509@net-b.de> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 20:47:00 -0000 Cc: gcc-patches , gfortran , Alessandro Fanfarillo Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0D163B01-6939-4FD4-B7EB-23695CD71538@comcast.net> References: <54A680CA.90509@net-b.de> To: Tobias Burnus X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Jan 2, 2015, at 3:28 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: > As found by Alessandro: Statically allocated coarrays in declared in the = specification part of a module didn't work (link-time failure). The reason = was that the associated coarray token was wrongly mangled and not a public = tree. >=20 > I additionally propagated the dg-compile-aux-modules support to caf.dg (c= urrently unused). > OK for the trunk? So, I usually let the fortran people review and comment on things like this= . They do a great job and seems pretty straight forward. I looked at it and didn=92t see anything that was objectionable to me. See= ms usual and customary.