From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 44608 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2015 08:48:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 44561 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2015 08:48:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-wi0-f169.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 08:48:17 +0000 Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so61150449wib.0; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 01:48:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.77.129 with SMTP id s1mr15166578wiw.67.1438418894490; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 01:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (95-210-223-77.ip.skylogicnet.com. [95.210.223.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ho10sm11356985wjb.39.2015.08.01.01.48.02 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Aug 2015 01:48:13 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Subject: Re: Patch for fortran/62536 and fortran/66175 From: FX In-Reply-To: <14ee727ec7b.104544e4343297.1918480250807930593@zoho.com> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 08:48:00 -0000 Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0D608873-FE85-4492-9577-352A04CB0EB7@gmail.com> References: <14ee727ec7b.104544e4343297.1918480250807930593@zoho.com> To: Louis Krupp X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 > This patch cleans up nested blocks when there's an unexpected end of a co= mpilation unit (66175), and it handles cleaned-up blocks gracefully (62536)= . I've run "make check-fortran" with the attached test cases. The patch is OK. But the question I missed in my earlier email was: do you have a copyright = assignment in place with the FSF? FX