RE: [PATCH] Add support for MIPS r3 and r5

[Andrew Bennett <Andrew.Bennett@imgtec.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandiford@googlemail.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2014 12:07
> To: Andrew Bennett
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Matthew Fortune; Saeed Ghazanfar; Rich Fuhler
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for MIPS r3 and r5
> 
> Andrew Bennett <Andrew.Bennett@imgtec.com> writes:
> >> > @@ -141,7 +151,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
> >> >    "%{EL:-m elf32lmip} \
> >> >     %{EB:-m elf32bmip} \
> >> >     %(endian_spec) \
> >> > -   %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2}
> >> %{mips64} \
> >> > +   %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2}
> >> \
> >> > +   %{mips32r3} %{mips32r5} %{mips64} \
> >> >     %(netbsd_link_spec)"
> >> >
> >> >  #define NETBSD_ENTRY_POINT "__start"
> >>
> >> Not sure the omission of mips64r2 was deliberate here, or in vxworks.h.
> >
> > Yes it was deliberate: mips64r2 was already missing from the original
> ASM_SPEC
> > in vxworks.h and the LINK_SPEC in netbsfd.h.
> 
> Right, but that's what I was saying didn't look deliberate.  I expect
> it was just missed when mips64r2 was added.

Would you like me to update the ASM_SPEC and LINK_SPEC to include mips64r[235]?

Regards,


Andrew