From: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
David <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Ping^2 [PATCH, rs6000] Split TImode for logical operations in expand pass [PR100694]
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 13:35:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b9cb9c6-2003-facf-fa2c-998a81d1e26c@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b189a32b-7f77-fcf3-fc33-cce3b4694388@linux.ibm.com>
Hi,
Gently ping this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611550.html
Thanks
Gui Haochen
在 2023/2/20 10:10, HAO CHEN GUI 写道:
> Hi,
> Gently ping this:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611550.html
>
> Gui Haochen
> Thanks
>
> 在 2023/2/8 13:08, HAO CHEN GUI 写道:
>> Hi,
>> The logical operations for TImode is split after reload pass right now. Some
>> potential optimizations miss as the split is too late. This patch removes
>> TImode from "AND", "IOR", "XOR" and "NOT" expander so that these logical
>> operations can be split at expand pass. The new test case illustrates the
>> optimization.
>>
>> Two test cases of pr92398 are merged into one as all sub-targets generates
>> the same sequence of instructions with the patch.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no regressions.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Gui Haochen
>>
>>
>> ChangeLog
>> 2023-02-08 Haochen Gui <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> gcc/
>> PR target/100694
>> * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (BOOL_128_V): New mode iterator for 128-bit
>> vector types.
>> (and<mode>3): Replace BOOL_128 with BOOL_128_V.
>> (ior<mode>3): Likewise.
>> (xor<mode>3): Likewise.
>> (one_cmpl<mode>2 expander): New expander with BOOL_128_V.
>> (one_cmpl<mode>2 insn_and_split): Rename to ...
>> (*one_cmpl<mode>2): ... this.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> PR target/100694
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c: New.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c: New.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h: Remove.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c: Remove.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c: Remove.
>>
>>
>> patch.diff
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
>> index 4bd1dfd3da9..455b7329643 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
>> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
>> @@ -743,6 +743,15 @@ (define_mode_iterator BOOL_128 [TI
>> (V2DF "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> (V1TI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")])
>>
>> +;; Mode iterator for logical operations on 128-bit vector types
>> +(define_mode_iterator BOOL_128_V [(V16QI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> + (V8HI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> + (V4SI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> + (V4SF "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> + (V2DI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> + (V2DF "TARGET_ALTIVEC")
>> + (V1TI "TARGET_ALTIVEC")])
>> +
>> ;; For the GPRs we use 3 constraints for register outputs, two that are the
>> ;; same as the output register, and a third where the output register is an
>> ;; early clobber, so we don't have to deal with register overlaps. For the
>> @@ -7135,23 +7144,23 @@ (define_expand "subti3"
>> ;; 128-bit logical operations expanders
>>
>> (define_expand "and<mode>3"
>> - [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> - (and:BOOL_128 (match_operand:BOOL_128 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> - (match_operand:BOOL_128 2 "vlogical_operand")))]
>> + [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> + (and:BOOL_128_V (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> + (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 2 "vlogical_operand")))]
>> ""
>> "")
>>
>> (define_expand "ior<mode>3"
>> - [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> - (ior:BOOL_128 (match_operand:BOOL_128 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> - (match_operand:BOOL_128 2 "vlogical_operand")))]
>> + [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> + (ior:BOOL_128_V (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> + (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 2 "vlogical_operand")))]
>> ""
>> "")
>>
>> (define_expand "xor<mode>3"
>> - [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> - (xor:BOOL_128 (match_operand:BOOL_128 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> - (match_operand:BOOL_128 2 "vlogical_operand")))]
>> + [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 0 "vlogical_operand")
>> + (xor:BOOL_128_V (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 1 "vlogical_operand")
>> + (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 2 "vlogical_operand")))]
>> ""
>> "")
>>
>> @@ -7449,7 +7458,14 @@ (define_insn_and_split "*eqv<mode>3_internal2"
>> (const_string "16")))])
>>
>> ;; 128-bit one's complement
>> -(define_insn_and_split "one_cmpl<mode>2"
>> +(define_expand "one_cmpl<mode>2"
>> +[(set (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 0 "vlogical_operand" "=<BOOL_REGS_OUTPUT>")
>> + (not:BOOL_128_V
>> + (match_operand:BOOL_128_V 1 "vlogical_operand" "<BOOL_REGS_UNARY>")))]
>> + ""
>> + "")
>> +
>> +(define_insn_and_split "*one_cmpl<mode>2"
>> [(set (match_operand:BOOL_128 0 "vlogical_operand" "=<BOOL_REGS_OUTPUT>")
>> (not:BOOL_128
>> (match_operand:BOOL_128 1 "vlogical_operand" "<BOOL_REGS_UNARY>")))]
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..96a895d6c44
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr100694.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {(?n)^\s+[a-z]} 3 } } */
>> +
>> +/* It just needs two std and one blr. */
>> +void foo (unsigned __int128* res, unsigned long long hi, unsigned long long lo)
>> +{
>> + unsigned __int128 i = hi;
>> + i <<= 64;
>> + i |= lo;
>> + *res = i;
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..7d6201cc5bb
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mnot\M} 2 } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd\M} 2 } } */
>> +
>> +/* All platforms should generate the same instructions: not;not;std;std. */
>> +void bar (__int128_t *dst, __int128_t src)
>> +{
>> + *dst = ~src;
>> +}
>> +
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 5a4a8bcab80..00000000000
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.h
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
>> -/* This test code is included into pr92398.p9-.c and pr92398.p9+.c.
>> - The two files have the tests for the number of instructions generated for
>> - P9- versus P9+.
>> -
>> - store generates difference instructions as below:
>> - P9+: mtvsrdd;xxlnot;stxv.
>> - P8/P7/P6 LE: not;not;std;std.
>> - P8 BE: mtvsrd;mtvsrd;xxpermdi;xxlnor;stxvd2x.
>> - P7/P6 BE: std;std;addi;lxvd2x;xxlnor;stxvd2x.
>> - P9+ and P9- LE are expected, P6/P7/P8 BE are unexpected. */
>> -
>> -void
>> -bar (__int128_t *dst, __int128_t src)
>> -{
>> - *dst = ~src;
>> -}
>> -
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 72dd1d9a274..00000000000
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9+.c
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
>> -/* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 && has_arch_pwr9 } } } */
>> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
>> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
>> -
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mmtvsrdd\M} 1 } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mxxlnor\M} 1 } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstxv\M} 1 } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mld\M} } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mnot\M} } } */
>> -
>> -/* Source code for the test in pr92398.h */
>> -#include "pr92398.h"
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index bd7fa98af51..00000000000
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr92398.p9-.c
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
>> -/* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 && {! has_arch_pwr9} } } } */
>> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
>> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -mvsx" } */
>> -
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mnot\M} 2 { xfail be } } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd\M} 2 { xfail { { {! has_arch_pwr9} && has_arch_pwr8 } && be } } } } */
>> -
>> -/* Source code for the test in pr92398.h */
>> -#include "pr92398.h"
>> -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-24 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 5:08 HAO CHEN GUI
2023-02-20 2:10 ` Ping " HAO CHEN GUI
2023-04-24 5:35 ` HAO CHEN GUI [this message]
2024-05-08 1:52 ` Ping^3 " HAO CHEN GUI
2023-05-22 9:40 ` Kewen.Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0b9cb9c6-2003-facf-fa2c-998a81d1e26c@linux.ibm.com \
--to=guihaoc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).