From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB8A3858D3C for ; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 10:44:40 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BAB8A3858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BAB8A3858D3C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1703328281; cv=none; b=vI8koupdE59kV5BqnawUWfL+5YbdCuujhH9PtEYaUGqcLAq6XUAsZqMq0ZYl6FFS5CRC7cEK0Eg5JERnY9QsjZVgZRRpeSuLF90XNznae6ffuR5Zh8j5HfQyaSf68E3AMfzRSeTmOK6mcq3SkY2zZPCJcxdBwq5XYtQXpjoIZGU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1703328281; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TVPH7wzirf9cYimRQhr06bIKGxdRYyzTjcdgIEcL6Uc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=SUpYMG4naUv97axQ4ja1pLoOnXkKEZ0IVQ0gkS1h2RaEwkJyYw7CUhI2/bUODolevwff2YBcg4Dj2zJy3SJMf/2C3HFq9UkXFdfmL2haMJBUm0lVzxRFOtLUz7lpVSPX417D3Pf1WRjgeHCoD+Cz2/3e8QPoGyeLydlRMEnFiSw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1703328277; bh=TVPH7wzirf9cYimRQhr06bIKGxdRYyzTjcdgIEcL6Uc=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FWSvusi+3uo0aIkPnxb/VjQLKefqvZUi2onXbwGBO2Haeh8Bi7f2TMgZAelqRHyn5 1CupmS/tExgIu3F9AFfwv6yu0mLbEjGenY5gcA7xRqhPnNVz438oaRNHgXGYJd8X1k pOPN6tDNWGqWqO9vohPAkbb7V+hlCvsQNxa3IA10= Received: from [IPv6:240e:358:11cd:fb00:dc73:854d:832e:2] (unknown [IPv6:240e:358:11cd:fb00:dc73:854d:832e:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EBFF66ECD; Sat, 23 Dec 2023 05:44:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0ca9482388b17b964b37a535ddd7c3e64b11fd93.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] LoongArch: Replace -mexplicit-relocs=auto simple-used address peephole2 with combine From: Xi Ruoyao To: chenglulu , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: i@xen0n.name, xuchenghua@loongson.cn Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 18:44:30 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20231212064754.6623-1-xry111@xry111.site> <64af9171-de9f-df27-1a84-b31fd0876a82@loongson.cn> <64c1875873aee3d8f196a4dd84fdf9f6fb3ee53d.camel@xry111.site> <8bb6e0c3-8e3c-7dc4-947d-fd338725fe16@loongson.cn> Autocrypt: addr=xry111@xry111.site; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 2023-12-23 at 10:29 +0800, chenglulu wrote: > > The performance drop has nothing to do with this patch. I found that th= e h264 performance compiled=20 > > by r14-6787 compared to r14-6421 dropped by 6.4%.=20 Then I guess we should create a bug report... > =C2=A0But there is a problem. My regression test has the following two fa= il items.(based on r14-6787) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/_Pragma3.c (test for excess errors) > +FAIL: gcc.dg/pr86617.c scan-rtl-dump-times final "mem/v" 6 Strange. I didn't see them on r14-6650 (with or without the patch). --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University