From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C00823858C5F for ; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 12:40:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C00823858C5F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org C00823858C5F Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1703421616; cv=none; b=ZdZgz6zLG3L5zP9UjxvDkz6oLELb8LiJg3HNd2nTsKv1rWRaMNQ52nNdKiKN56qO9dA6y8YZMlmKVA6PcoHu8hsk46l7sK5bicgbQF8yPJJe8dS6F0NgWPrlM/UvVL0BM77o7zNFwidnnHSnjbixoNsz/3zhk257l1TyEcB8ZMg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1703421616; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/IxtY5C4fLvd/t+cbGfxSuPGNCIIn6Va/iqhmUZ/3Ew=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=n03onhy61f93V6ZNS/o9BN8zI9cTgrj2ukbVdpbDA/Y9z6lv9FQMdqIX9B813p3iYRPhTD4hb9ZWt21EYVsHpnm7vLS826CSZcNJkNpeCDD5L/qSm9x5O7iNau/NuucSZsgURYyD3XIdgQ/ri1GjHM+QuH2exe8WeBHERaAnYP0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1703421613; bh=/IxtY5C4fLvd/t+cbGfxSuPGNCIIn6Va/iqhmUZ/3Ew=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aJ6+obZj4vHriND3isdAkZxlGXN20614Lo7MxUC8fDtzTFR5Gr9Bn6XzeAcvPmvzA M+kmC31GAXfuGDB5mGtiWUJ/3hqU504ygYuEj2RVpX0rVQA6S5rOa8NAiiKPQUJHEn x9nGlaMukivvzrQSX4Syvw9UbtBcxF+QFQ10Ep/U= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16D6567120; Sun, 24 Dec 2023 07:40:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0e9549bc7ca7dbefc9f582b191f97acca30095af.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Expand left rotate to right rotate with negated amount From: Xi Ruoyao To: chenglulu , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: i@xen0n.name, xuchenghua@loongson.cn, c@jia.je Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2023 20:40:09 +0800 In-Reply-To: <73f1d77deffec273aca849f4dfea8bbd7a5cd950.camel@xry111.site> References: <20231218134414.1513666-1-xry111@xry111.site> <6a6dbeaf59c6319d15748ec0c053b26c01fe4b01.camel@xry111.site> <73f1d77deffec273aca849f4dfea8bbd7a5cd950.camel@xry111.site> Autocrypt: addr=xry111@xry111.site; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sun, 2023-12-24 at 01:04 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Sun, 2023-12-24 at 00:56 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > On Sat, 2023-12-23 at 15:00 +0800, chenglulu wrote: > > > Hi, > > >=20 > > > This patch will cause the following tests to fail: > > >=20 > > > +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97081-2.c (internal compiler error: in extract_i= nsn, at recog.cc:2812) > > > +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97081-2.c (test for excess errors) > > > +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97081-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (internal comp= iler error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812) > > > +FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97081-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for exce= ss errors) > >=20 > > I can reproduce it now but it did not happen when I submitted the patch= . > > The difference may be caused by a different binutils version or some > > other changes in GCC.=C2=A0 I'll figure it out... >=20 > Phew, it was simple.=C2=A0 I uploaded an earlier draft version of this pa= tch > onto the dev box :(. Fixed the issue in v2. --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University