From: Carl Love <cel@linux.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
"bergner@linux.ibm.com" <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 9/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp and __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp built-ins
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:18:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f58ee81-3c83-4885-886f-58ffb7f768ec@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6378d560-df55-4b75-be7b-93dc6b85d81a@linux.ibm.com>
rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp and __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp built-ins
The undocumented __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp and __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp are
redundant. The overloaded vec_neg built-in provides the same
functionality. The two buit-ins are not documented nor are there any
test cases for them.
Remove the definitions so users will use the overloaded vec_neg built-in
which is documented in the PVIPR.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def (__builtin_vsx_xvnegdp,
__builtin_vsx_xvnegsp): Remove built-in definitions.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
index f33564d3d9c..d65c858ac0c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
@@ -1763,12 +1763,6 @@
const vf __builtin_vsx_xvnabssp (vf);
XVNABSSP vsx_nabsv4sf2 {}
- const vd __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp (vd);
- XVNEGDP negv2df2 {}
-
- const vf __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp (vf);
- XVNEGSP negv4sf2 {}
-
const vd __builtin_vsx_xvnmadddp (vd, vd, vd);
XVNMADDDP nfmav2df4 {}
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 21:04 [PATCH 0/13] rs6000, built-in cleanup patch series Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_cmple* builtins Carl Love
2024-05-13 6:28 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 8:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:18 ` Carl Love
2024-05-27 1:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/13] rs6000, fix error in unsigned vector float to unsigned int built-in definitions Carl Love
2024-05-14 7:00 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/13] rs6000, extend the current vec_{un,}signed{e,o} built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 7:53 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-17 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-05-20 1:10 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 5/13] rs6000, remove duplicated built-ins of vecmergl and vec_mergeh Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:06 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 6/13] rs6000, add overloaded vec_sel with int128 arguments Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:54 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-22 0:13 ` Carl Love
2024-05-22 3:05 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 7/13] rs6000, remove the vec_xxsel built-ins, they are duplicates Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:55 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 8/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_vperm_* built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:59 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` Carl Love [this message]
2024-05-14 3:01 ` [PATCH 9/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp and __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp built-ins Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 10/13] rs6000, extend vec_xxpermdi built-in for __int128 args Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:14 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 11/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvcmpeqsp_p built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 12/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvcmpeqsp built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:37 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-23 18:21 ` Carl Love
2024-05-24 10:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 15:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 13/13] rs6000, remove vector set and vector init built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:44 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-23 0:29 ` Carl Love
2024-05-23 2:27 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-10 15:15 ` [PING} Re: [PATCH 0/13] rs6000, built-in cleanup patch series Carl Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f58ee81-3c83-4885-886f-58ffb7f768ec@linux.ibm.com \
--to=cel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).