From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1846 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2002 16:47:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1833 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 16:47:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (12.150.115.133) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 16:47:14 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBMGgsh08753; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:42:54 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBMGl1f17666; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:47:02 -0500 Received: from [192.168.64.12] (vpn50-16.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.16]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBMGl0n19294; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 08:47:00 -0800 Subject: Re: Java Patches: -fno-org-xml-sax and -fno-org-w3c-dom From: Anthony Green To: Tom Tromey Cc: java-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87k7i4mjhw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <1038718968.31616.23.camel@escape> <87k7i4mjhw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 08:47:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1040575723.1466.753.camel@escape> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2002-12/txt/msg01190.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 14:08, Tom Tromey wrote: > If you want to, feel free to check in the libgcj part. If you do > that, please update the manual to reflect the need for the new `-l' > options. Done.. to both branch and trunk. Thanks. 2002-12-22 Anthony Green * gcj.texi (Limitations): Add note about org.xml.sax and org.w3c.dom. Index: gcj.texi =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/java/gcj.texi,v retrieving revision 1.43 diff -2 -c -p -r1.43 gcj.texi *** gcj.texi 16 Dec 2002 21:59:43 -0000 1.43 --- gcj.texi 22 Dec 2002 16:43:39 -0000 *************** from the JDK implementation. This is no *** 516,519 **** --- 516,530 ---- affects you, it probably makes sense to report it so that we can discuss the appropriate response. + + @item + @command{gcj} does not currently allow for piecemeal replacement of + components within @code{libgcj}. Unfortunately, programmers often want + to use newer versions of certain packages, such as those provided by + the Apache Software Foundation's Jakarta project. This has forced us + to place the @code{org.w3c.dom} and @code{org.xml.sax} packages into + their own libraries, separate from @code{libgcj}. If you intend to + use these classes, you must link them explicitly with + @code{-l-org-w3c-dom} and @code{-l-org-xml-sax}. Future versions of + @command{gcj} may not have this restriction. @end itemize