public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
To: dberlin@dberlin.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re:  [patch] for PR 18040
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10410172054.AA01431@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> (raw)

    Except that this is exactly what you are doing by making it so
    conversions can appear more or less anywhere in an expression, instead
    of just a single place.

Not "more or less anywhere", it's precisely just inside a chain of references.
Since the expander treats this as a single reference, I don't see why the
optimizers care about what's inside that except in special situations.

It *really* pessimizes the code to not allow them, plus, as I've said, it
means we can't convert all valid GENERIC to GIMPLE. 

    1. Don't allow casts except at the top level. Deal with consequences.

I'd argue exactly the other way around: having a cast at the top level
of a nest of references isn't necessary, so we can require that it be
in it's own statement. But inside is where it's useful.

    2. Make them mandatory inside component_refs, so that you *always* have
    them there.  This is what LLVM does with getelementptr. Each piece has a
    type specifier

I don't follow.  Since every tree node has a type, we always have it.
It seems that all you need is an access function that strips off the
conversion and you have the same form.

             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-17 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-17 21:04 Richard Kenner [this message]
2004-10-17 21:10 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-19 21:36   ` Richard Henderson
2004-10-19 22:19     ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-20  7:03       ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 22:51     ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-20  0:02       ` Richard Henderson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-20 13:27 Richard Kenner
2004-10-20  0:25 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:26 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:22 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:03 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:13 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 22:48 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:01 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 23:07 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 17:48 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 15:42 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 14:52 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 15:20 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-18 14:38 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 14:24 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 22:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 14:22 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 22:47 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18  3:12 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18  4:02 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18  4:26   ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-18  2:46 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18  2:38 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18  3:14 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18  2:35 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18  2:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 23:06 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 23:45 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18  0:23   ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 22:30 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 22:36 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-10-17 23:41 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 13:13   ` Florian Weimer
2004-10-18 17:24     ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-18 17:37       ` Florian Weimer
2004-10-18 18:02         ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 22:40     ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 21:24 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 21:43 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 21:18 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 21:26 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 20:25 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 20:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 20:17 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 20:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 19:46 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 19:46 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 19:48 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-10-17 20:01   ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 19:28 Zdenek Dvorak
2004-10-19 21:36 ` Richard Henderson
2004-10-19 22:03   ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-10-19 22:04     ` Andrew Pinski
2004-10-19 22:06       ` Zdenek Dvorak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10410172054.AA01431@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --to=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).