From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
To: dberlin@dberlin.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch] for PR 18040
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10410181544.AA05501@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> (raw)
It is much easier to optimize expressions that are simple, regardless
of how they are split up, because it makes your optimizers simpler to
write, and you are much less likely to miss corner cases, etc.
Sorry, I wasn't asking the general question, but about this specific case.
I'd like to see how it's easier to optimize cases with a conversion between
two field references when they are in two statements than in one.
next reply other threads:[~2004-10-18 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-18 15:42 Richard Kenner [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-20 13:27 Richard Kenner
2004-10-20 0:25 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:26 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:22 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:03 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:13 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 22:48 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 23:01 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 23:07 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 17:48 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 14:52 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 15:20 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-18 14:38 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 14:24 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 22:50 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 14:22 Richard Kenner
2004-10-19 22:47 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 3:12 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 4:02 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 4:26 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-18 2:46 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 2:38 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 3:14 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 2:35 Richard Kenner
2004-10-18 2:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 23:06 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 23:45 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 0:23 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 22:30 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 22:36 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-10-17 23:41 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-18 13:13 ` Florian Weimer
2004-10-18 17:24 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-18 17:37 ` Florian Weimer
2004-10-18 18:02 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 22:40 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 21:24 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 21:43 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 21:18 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 21:26 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-17 21:04 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 21:10 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-19 21:36 ` Richard Henderson
2004-10-19 22:19 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-20 7:03 ` Jason Merrill
2004-10-19 22:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-10-20 0:02 ` Richard Henderson
2004-10-17 20:25 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 20:47 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 20:17 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 20:25 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 19:46 Richard Kenner
2004-10-17 19:46 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 19:48 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-10-17 20:01 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-10-17 19:28 Zdenek Dvorak
2004-10-19 21:36 ` Richard Henderson
2004-10-19 22:03 ` Zdenek Dvorak
2004-10-19 22:04 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-10-19 22:06 ` Zdenek Dvorak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10410181544.AA05501@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--to=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).