From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26593 invoked by alias); 12 May 2014 19:14:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26577 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2014 19:14:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.16) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:36 +0000 Received: from omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.74]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 16Hd1o0061bwxycA17EaYB; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:34 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:5f80:ba4::1] ([IPv6:2601:9:5f80:ba4::1]) by omta18.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 17EZ1o01A2nwLhK8e7EajT; Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a couple of dialect and warning options regarding Objective-C instance variable scope From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: <53711978.7000404@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:14:00 -0000 Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Patches" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <10610AAF-A142-4566-A67E-A03C4716A219@comcast.net> References: <52F35508.4080205@gmail.com> <5486E33D-B8F6-473F-8F33-6A7DEECB45A8@comcast.net> <5359999C.7090607@gmail.com> <757BB622-2CA8-4C9A-BCA9-AAD1FDF8F14F@comcast.net> <535A8EA8.5040706@gmail.com> <80E7465A-6FE8-475D-873E-FF2F2C8EC2ED@comcast.net> <535E2EF9.3070500@gmail.com> <904A6DC5-2EFF-4C6A-9E2D-62DAB3045FBF@comcast.net> <53711978.7000404@gmail.com> To: Dimitris Papavasiliou X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00847.txt.bz2 On May 12, 2014, at 11:56 AM, Dimitris Papavasiliou wr= ote: > So we [ .. ] expect that they silently shadow the instance variables, tha= t is that warnings are _not_ generated. Perfect, thanks. I=92ve checked it in: Committed revision 210333. Thanks for all your hard work. > So I take it that I should change these to dg-bogus since this is behavio= r expected in the past but not now, as well as any other expected non-warni= ngs in the other test cases? Is it important in some way that dg-bogus mak= es no distinction between warning and error messages? No. One could, but, not necessary.