From: kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
To: richard.guenther@gmail.com
Cc: ebotcazou@adacore.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tree SRA and atomicity/volatility
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 13:12:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10701081317.AA05563@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000701080352x517b891cva220bc67f75a2a06@mail.gmail.com>
> Still, middle-end support for this kind of stuff could be useful -
> maybe using volatile bitfields instead of a volatile structure type.
Could you say what kinds of semantics a volatile bitfield might have? To me,
that sounds somewhat self-contradictory since bitfields often do things
like cross byte boundaries.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-08 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-06 13:19 Eric Botcazou
2007-01-06 13:31 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-06 13:47 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-06 13:49 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-07 11:23 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-08 11:30 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-08 11:52 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-08 12:43 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-08 13:12 ` Richard Kenner [this message]
2007-01-08 13:40 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-08 14:55 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-12 13:57 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-12 16:36 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-12 17:03 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-14 7:47 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-14 14:57 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-19 13:58 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-23 16:58 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-23 17:15 ` Daniel Berlin
2007-01-23 17:24 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-23 19:38 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-23 20:57 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-23 22:07 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-24 1:39 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-24 13:33 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-24 1:31 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-24 9:27 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-24 13:02 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-24 13:33 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-24 13:57 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-24 18:31 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-24 23:57 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-25 9:38 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-25 11:38 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-25 16:32 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-25 16:41 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-25 18:29 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-25 22:03 ` Mike Stump
2007-01-26 2:37 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-26 2:44 ` Mike Stump
2007-01-26 2:54 ` Mark Mitchell
2007-01-26 9:17 ` Richard Guenther
2007-01-26 10:12 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-01-26 13:40 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-26 13:13 ` Richard Kenner
2007-01-26 19:21 ` Mike Stump
2007-01-24 0:53 ` Richard Kenner
2007-03-02 14:55 ` Eric Botcazou
2007-03-02 15:21 ` Diego Novillo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10701081317.AA05563@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--to=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
--cc=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).