From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28772 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2004 21:42:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28733 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2004 21:42:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 2004 21:42:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i59LgBi5029547; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:42:11 -0400 Received: from [172.31.0.11] (vpn50-5.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.5]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i59LgA031725; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:42:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [patch] Minor improvement to typeclass.h From: Jeffrey A Law Reply-To: law@redhat.com To: Zack Weinberg Cc: Jerry Quinn , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <877julhhlb.fsf@codesourcery.com> References: <877julhhlb.fsf@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat, Inc Message-Id: <1086817343.18174.320.camel@speedy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 22:35:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00569.txt.bz2 On Sat, 2004-06-05 at 14:31, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Jerry Quinn writes: > > > 2004-06-05 Jerry Quinn > > > > * typeclass.h: Add license and include guard. > > I think this file should be under the libgcc exception. Why? typeclass.h isn't used inside libgcc at all, nor is it installed for use by users. It's usage appears to be strictly within GCC itself -- which would indicate to me it ought to be straight GPL. jeff