public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>,
	Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm@polyomino.org.uk>,
	Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>,
	Richard Kenner <kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1088105453.7659.6.camel@pc.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406241903.i5OJ3hv24750@tin.geop.uc.edu>

On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 21:03, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Or even better look at the individual build time for the SPEC benchmarks:
> <http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/gcc/individual-build-secs_elapsed.html>
> 
> You will see that VPR and GCC compile time increased after the patch went in.

I agree on this data point, but the discussion was long range compile
time performance.

There are many days in the past where compile
time increase for a few days and then the problem is fixed
(which is hopefully likely to happen here to).

One thing to note is that Diego machine is a Pentium4 which is
very sensitive to small changes in code generation (much more than
Pentium 3 or Athlon), it might be better to build the daily GCC with
-mcpu=pentium4 on such machines.

Laurent

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-24 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-22 20:23 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:37 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-23 20:47 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-06-24 14:59   ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-24 16:26     ` Richard Earnshaw
2004-06-24 19:57       ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-06-24 20:06         ` Diego Novillo
2004-06-24 20:24           ` Andrew Pinski
2004-06-24 22:35             ` Laurent GUERBY [this message]
2004-06-24 21:33           ` Laurent GUERBY
2004-06-24 21:01         ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-25 14:51         ` Richard Earnshaw
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-07-29 19:02 Richard Kenner
2004-07-29 18:43 Richard Kenner
2004-07-29 17:12 Richard Kenner
2004-07-29 17:13 ` Diego Novillo
2004-07-29 17:57 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-25 15:28 Richard Kenner
2004-06-28 15:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2004-06-24 15:58 Richard Kenner
2004-06-24 16:04 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-25 14:43 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-23  5:54 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23  2:32 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23  4:54 ` Bryce McKinlay
2004-06-23  0:16 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 23:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23 11:42 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 22:18 Richard Kenner
2004-06-23  1:07 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 21:30 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 22:04 ` Paul Brook
2004-06-22 21:27 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 21:10 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:12 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 22:16 ` Daniel Berlin
2004-06-22 21:07 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:12 ` Bryce McKinlay
2004-06-22 21:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:01 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:54 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:06 ` Paul Brook
2004-06-22 21:37 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 20:44 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 21:03 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-23 20:58 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-06-22 20:40 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 22:02 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 22:27   ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-22 20:22 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:30 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 19:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 20:10 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-22 20:27 ` Andrew Haley
     [not found] <10406221359.AA05860@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
2004-06-22 18:47 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 18:33 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 18:19 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 18:36 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 18:37   ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-06-22 18:45 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 17:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 17:21 ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-22 19:01   ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 16:34 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 16:33 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22 17:46 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22 18:17   ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-06-22 18:52   ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 19:37     ` Zack Weinberg
2004-06-22  7:05 Richard Kenner
2004-06-22  7:29 ` Mark Mitchell
2004-06-22  9:14   ` Andrew Pinski
2004-06-22 14:16   ` Andrew Haley
2004-06-22 11:00 ` Richard Henderson
2004-06-22 13:52 ` Ranjit Mathew
2004-07-29 17:02 ` Diego Novillo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1088105453.7659.6.camel@pc.site \
    --to=laurent@guerby.net \
    --cc=dnovillo@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=geoffk@geoffk.org \
    --cc=jsm@polyomino.org.uk \
    --cc=kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu \
    --cc=pinskia@physics.uc.edu \
    --cc=rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).