From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15282 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 21:09:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15274 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 21:09:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail15.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.51) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 21:09:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 18212 invoked by uid 503); 18 Oct 2004 21:07:01 -0000 Received: from d213-101-203-28.cust.tele2.fr (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (laurent%guerby.net@213.101.203.28) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 21:07:01 -0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR middle-end/17813 From: Laurent GUERBY To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Kenner In-Reply-To: <200410182239.53232.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> References: <10410181708.AA06150@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <200410182239.53232.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1098133742.17915.202.camel@pc.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:17:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01548.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 22:39, Eric Botcazou wrote: > > But that doesn't need an Ada-aware debugger! I use that all the time > > with non-Ada-aware debuggers. Just do > > > > define pn > > set pn($) > > end > > I obviously missed something. So the debug functions are exposed by the > front-end through a C interface? More generally, is a non-Ada-aware debugger > sufficient to debug the Ada part of the front-end? See ada/treepr.ads and ada/sprint.ads for more documentation, the "pX" function are pragma Exported so they're callable from gdb even if not Ada aware. Laurent