From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21615 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2004 05:02:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21587 invoked from network); 23 Oct 2004 05:01:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Oct 2004 05:01:59 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9N51uBh010522; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:01:56 -0400 Received: from pobox.toronto.redhat.com (pobox.toronto.redhat.com [172.16.14.4]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i9N51or32582; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:01:50 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (vpn50-15.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.15]) by pobox.toronto.redhat.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9N51mbU025993; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 01:01:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Implement must-def kill operand From: Diego Novillo To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Andrew Pinski , Daniel Berlin , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Andrew Macleod In-Reply-To: <4179B31F.4020905@codesourcery.com> References: <3CE2FCAE-22E6-11D9-8879-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> <4179B31F.4020905@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Red Hat Canada Message-Id: <1098507722.27985.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:56:00 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01978.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 21:25, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > > On Oct 17, 2004, at 10:00 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > >> [Diego, if this isn't accepted for mainline, i'd still like to put it > >> on TCB, so if you could take a look at it, i'd appreciate it] > > > I've reviewed the PR and this thread, and I'd definitely like to see the > (finished) version of this patch go in. I think that Daniel and Diego > are converging nicely to a solution. > Yes, I failed to make it explicit in my previous messages, but once Dan finishes the latest tweaks to the patch, I will recommend that it be applied on mainline. Diego.