From: Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodruff@foss.arm.com>
To: James Greenhalgh <james.greenhalgh@arm.com>
Cc: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"richard.sandiford@linaro.org" <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [AArch64, PATCH] Improve Neon store of zero
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <10b0413b-c929-f697-24cc-72fc336f5016@foss.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170912162806.GB33912@arm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3495 bytes --]
Hi,
I have addressed the issues you raised below.
Is the amended patch OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Jackson.
On 09/12/2017 05:28 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:02:52AM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've attached a new patch that addresses some of the issues raised with
>> my original patch.
>>
>> On 08/23/2017 03:35 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
>>> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for only noticing now, but the call to aarch64_legitimate_address_p
>>>> is asking whether the MEM itself is a legitimate LDP/STP address. Also,
>>>> it might be better to pass false for strict_p, since this can be called
>>>> before RA. So maybe:
>>>>
>>>> if (GET_CODE (operands[0]) == MEM
>>>> && !(aarch64_simd_imm_zero (operands[1], <MODE>mode)
>>>> && aarch64_mem_pair_operand (operands[0], <MODE>mode)))
>>
>> There were also some issues with the choice of mode for the call the
>> aarch64_mem_pair_operand.
>>
>> For a 128-bit wide mode, we want to check `aarch64_mem_pair_operand
>> (operands[0], DImode)` since that's what the stp will be.
>>
>> For a 64-bit wide mode, we don't need to do that check because a normal
>> `str` can be issued.
>>
>> I've updated the condition as such.
>>
>>>
>>> Is there any reason for doing this check at all (or at least this early during
>>> expand)?
>>
>> Not doing this check means that the zero is forced into a register, so
>> we then carry around a bit more RTL and rely on combine to merge things.
>>
>>>
>>> There is a similar issue with this part:
>>>
>>> (define_insn "*aarch64_simd_mov<mode>"
>>> [(set (match_operand:VQ 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
>>> - "=w, m, w, ?r, ?w, ?r, w")
>>> + "=w, Ump, m, w, ?r, ?w, ?r, w")
>>>
>>> The Ump causes the instruction to always split off the address offset. Ump
>>> cannot be used in patterns that are generated before register allocation as it
>>> also calls laarch64_legitimate_address_p with strict_p set to true.
>>
>> I've changed the constraint to a new constraint 'Umq', that acts the
>> same as Ump, but calls aarch64_legitimate_address_p with strict_p set to
>> false and uses DImode for the mode to pass.
>
> This looks mostly OK to me, but this conditional:
>
>> + if (GET_CODE (operands[0]) == MEM
>> + && !(aarch64_simd_imm_zero (operands[1], <MODE>mode)
>> + && ((GET_MODE_SIZE (<MODE>mode) == 16
>> + && aarch64_mem_pair_operand (operands[0], DImode))
>> + || GET_MODE_SIZE (<MODE>mode) == 8)))
>
> Has grown a bit too big in such a general pattern to live without a comment
> explaining what is going on.
>
>> +(define_memory_constraint "Umq"
>> + "@internal
>> + A memory address which uses a base register with an offset small enough for
>> + a load/store pair operation in DI mode."
>> + (and (match_code "mem")
>> + (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (DImode, XEXP (op, 0),
>> + PARALLEL, 0)")))
>
> And here you want 'false' rather than '0'.
>
> I'll happily merge the patch with those changes, please send an update.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
>>
>> ChangeLog:
>>
>> gcc/
>>
>> 2017-08-29 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodruff@arm.com>
>>
>> * config/aarch64/constraints.md (Umq): New constraint.
>> * config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md (*aarch64_simd_mov<mode>):
>> Change to use Umq.
>> (mov<mode>): Update condition.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite
>>
>> 2017-08-29 Jackson Woodruff <jackson.woodruff@arm.com>
>>
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vect_str_zero.c:
>> Update testcase.
>
[-- Attachment #2: patchfile --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2974 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
index f3e084f8778d70c82823b92fa80ff96021ad26db..c20e513f59a35f3410eae3eb0fdc2fc86352a9fc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
@@ -23,10 +23,17 @@
(match_operand:VALL_F16 1 "general_operand" ""))]
"TARGET_SIMD"
"
- if (GET_CODE (operands[0]) == MEM
- && !(aarch64_simd_imm_zero (operands[1], <MODE>mode)
- && aarch64_legitimate_address_p (<MODE>mode, operands[0],
- PARALLEL, 1)))
+ /* Force the operand into a register if it is not an
+ immediate whose use can be replaced with xzr.
+ If the mode is 16 bytes wide, then we will be doing
+ a stp in DI mode, so we check the validity of that.
+ If the mode is 8 bytes wide, then we will do doing a
+ normal str, so the check need not apply. */
+ if (GET_CODE (operands[0]) == MEM
+ && !(aarch64_simd_imm_zero (operands[1], <MODE>mode)
+ && ((GET_MODE_SIZE (<MODE>mode) == 16
+ && aarch64_mem_pair_operand (operands[0], DImode))
+ || GET_MODE_SIZE (<MODE>mode) == 8)))
operands[1] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[1]);
"
)
@@ -126,7 +133,7 @@
(define_insn "*aarch64_simd_mov<mode>"
[(set (match_operand:VQ 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
- "=w, Ump, m, w, ?r, ?w, ?r, w")
+ "=w, Umq, m, w, ?r, ?w, ?r, w")
(match_operand:VQ 1 "general_operand"
"m, Dz, w, w, w, r, r, Dn"))]
"TARGET_SIMD
diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md
index 9ce3d4efaf31a301dfb7c1772a6b685fb2cbd2ee..3649fb48a33454c208a6b81e051fdd316c495710 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/constraints.md
@@ -156,6 +156,14 @@
(and (match_code "mem")
(match_test "REG_P (XEXP (op, 0))")))
+(define_memory_constraint "Umq"
+ "@internal
+ A memory address which uses a base register with an offset small enough for
+ a load/store pair operation in DI mode."
+ (and (match_code "mem")
+ (match_test "aarch64_legitimate_address_p (DImode, XEXP (op, 0),
+ PARALLEL, false)")))
+
(define_memory_constraint "Ump"
"@internal
A memory address suitable for a load/store pair operation."
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vect_str_zero.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vect_str_zero.c
index 07198de109432b530745cc540790303ae0245efb..00cbf20a0b293e71ed713f0c08d89d8a525fa785 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vect_str_zero.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vect_str_zero.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ void
f (uint32x4_t *p)
{
uint32x4_t x = { 0, 0, 0, 0};
- p[1] = x;
+ p[4] = x;
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "stp\txzr, xzr," } } */
}
@@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ void
g (float32x2_t *p)
{
float32x2_t x = {0.0, 0.0};
- p[0] = x;
+ p[400] = x;
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "str\txzr, " } } */
}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "add\tx\[0-9\]\+, x0, \[0-9\]+" } } */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 15:06 Wilco Dijkstra
2017-09-06 9:03 ` Jackson Woodruff
2017-09-12 16:28 ` James Greenhalgh
2017-09-13 16:35 ` Jackson Woodruff [this message]
2017-09-13 16:51 ` James Greenhalgh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-10 13:38 Jackson Woodruff
2017-08-11 15:16 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2017-08-16 16:01 ` Jackson Woodruff
2017-08-17 13:56 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2017-08-23 14:46 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=10b0413b-c929-f697-24cc-72fc336f5016@foss.arm.com \
--to=jackson.woodruff@foss.arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=james.greenhalgh@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).