From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AEE03858D20 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 08:51:55 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 0AEE03858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 0AEE03858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712479916; cv=none; b=HlZ33m9kEA4F3lIVxkPmvsJNLFotDZZj3M8hhzTr45pSJU1p3XkzMm5Z8DRKzmHnAl3mTTMErZX2RdmTggBXwfPY9Fo8FEn+bUoZBg/vND7R0DB4fLB1BTNowzBfq1nu4wSIskL2+S9bhqGWy5D4a5ViDjRIuVIL9POVBDSvBc8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712479916; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uNrGOMR11nyl7MeBhSLy8ROS89jKYJBKBFh5jZmCVBw=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=T5kxqmI9+D/w0F9RjkRlJaGgjLhgyc3CLs+yy8Ytj7n1amHGrkydgyF5RN8gk6QiSQuwgS12dcGMr4RTInRjVIRNSyWNOCaHO2IOAFJAcKEfvrYw7cGS8NRgxemExzlwJ+D2Mvqkf/Uc7BwQ7nFNyhYI6zkm+CAPFLQzcqYjLrs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1712479913; bh=uNrGOMR11nyl7MeBhSLy8ROS89jKYJBKBFh5jZmCVBw=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KXTVhs7SyhuRMr2ewKiigtSPzd054OzE4Wz5Xgf29mtwYqyR+4MMBkL6DOw6E3+4b QaonZ3DCUw8DG2yZPkNYKydPSc0zU/iYQUSREuvonWxI6X/BKrb9EHEGvCLdo9WHMp Gd3pnppu1Fb806G4KyXDRXsXRIHQEU/yIPDVF0OY= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5442D66D9D; Sun, 7 Apr 2024 04:51:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <10eb4350f8ae3c49601f4da7135abd6cf6dd518e.camel@xry111.site> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ICF&SRA: Make ICF and SRA agree on padding From: Xi Ruoyao To: Martin Jambor , GCC Patches Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2024 16:51:51 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, 2024-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: > The patch has been approved by Honza in Bugzilla. (I hope.=C2=A0 He did w= rite > it looked reasonable.)=C2=A0 Together with the patch for PR 113907, it ha= s > passed bootstrap, LTO bootstrap and LTO profiledbootstrap and testing on > x86_64-linux and bootstrap and LTO bootstrap on ppc64le-linux.=C2=A0 It a= lso > passed normal bootstrap on aarch64-linux but there many testcases failed > because the compiler timed out.=C2=A0 The machine is old and slow and mig= ht > have been oversubscribed so my plan is to try again on gcc185 from > cfarm.=C2=A0 If that goes well, I intend to commit the patch and then sta= rt > working on backports. I've tried these two patches out on my own 24-core AArch64 machine.=20 Bootstrapped (but no LTO or PGO) and regtested fine. --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University