From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14753 invoked by alias); 19 Jan 2007 01:18:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 14743 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jan 2007 01:18:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (HELO ausmtp04.au.ibm.com) (202.81.18.152) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:18:42 +0000 Received: from sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (d23rh904.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.202]) by ausmtp04.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0J1Wmoa268520 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:32:53 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (d23av03.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.244]) by sd0208e0.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l0J1M1Zg186414 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:22:01 +1100 Received: from d23av03.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l0J1IWdm026881 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:18:32 +1100 Received: from ozlabs.au.ibm.com (ozlabs.au.ibm.com [9.190.163.12]) by d23av03.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0J1IVj0026870; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:18:31 +1100 Received: from [10.61.2.156] (haven.au.ibm.com [9.190.164.82]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681B67379A; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:18:31 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Patch pings From: Ben Elliston To: Ben Elliston Cc: Mike Stump , Ian Lance Taylor , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <1169090717.11727.7.camel@localhost> References: <1169009449.16957.11.camel@localhost> <1169072479.5748.2.camel@localhost> <1169090717.11727.7.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 01:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1169169511.20646.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg01575.txt.bz2 > Right. The stricter requirement I am proposing is pretty conservative: > I am proposing that we move up to a new point release of flex that is > coming up to its 4th birthday in March. It's not exactly bleeding edge. I think this discussion is taking place in a thread with an uninteresting subject on the busy gcc-patches list. I'll raise my idea on gcc@ where it will be seen. Ben