From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32491 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2007 19:44:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 32483 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2007 19:44:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e3.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.143) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:44:03 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e3.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6RIdghG006396 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:39:42 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.4) with ESMTP id l6RJi0L7368088 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:44:00 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l6RJi0qZ032019 for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:44:00 -0400 Received: from [9.67.0.167] (wecm-9-67-0-167.wecm.ibm.com [9.67.0.167]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6RJhxJj031975; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:44:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR testsuite/32471 when INT_MAX is not 0x7fffffff From: Janis Johnson Reply-To: janis187@us.ibm.com To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20070727155625.GL3001@sygehus.dk> References: <20070727155625.GL3001@sygehus.dk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:10:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1185565438.6786.2.camel@janis-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg02011.txt.bz2 On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 17:56 +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > This patch fixes the test cases for PR 30364 which test overflow > behaviour of integers. With "gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian > 4.1.1-21)", pr30364-1.c still fails at -O2, which is what bug 30364 was > opened for. For mainline x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, there are no changes in > test results (they still all pass) while for m32c-unknown-elf, they now all > pass where they all used to fail (for a total of 36 FAILs). > > Ok for trunk? :REVIEWMAIL: OK. Janis