From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12688 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2007 20:06:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 12680 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jul 2007 20:06:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (HELO e5.ny.us.ibm.com) (32.97.182.145) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:06:12 +0000 Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l6UK6AYX016659 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:06:10 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.4) with ESMTP id l6UK6AkK330932 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:06:10 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l6UK6Abw019377 for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:06:10 -0400 Received: from [9.47.18.89] (dyn9047018089.beaverton.ibm.com [9.47.18.89]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l6UK69Hb019345; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:06:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Vectorizer testsuite fixes From: Janis Johnson Reply-To: janis187@us.ibm.com To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20070730193449.GS25795@sygehus.dk> References: <20070730134217.GK25795@sygehus.dk> <20070730193449.GS25795@sygehus.dk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:40:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1185825969.7009.19.camel@janis-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg02145.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 21:34 +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: > This patch allows two vectorizer tests to work on 16-bit targets by > making the vector elements of type "char". This fixes two failures on > ia16-unkonwn-elf and m32c-unknown-elf with no changes on > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, arm-unknown-elf, cris-axis-elf, > mipsisa64-unknown-elf, sh-unknown-elf or v850-unknown-elf. Ok for trunk? This is OK. Janis