From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30243 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2008 15:32:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 30223 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2008 15:32:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (HELO e35.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:32:18 +0000 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2AFWGuN008746 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:32:16 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2AFWGoj163582 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:32:16 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2AFWGEJ026048 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:32:16 -0600 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (vorma.rchland.ibm.com [9.10.86.174]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m2AFWExX025982; Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:32:15 -0600 Subject: [PING H.J. Lu] Re: [PATCH] PR35371 GCSE loses track of REG_POINTER attribute From: Peter Bergner To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: Richard Sandiford , gcc-patches , Jeff Law In-Reply-To: <1204240130.7376.16.camel@otta> References: <20080225222624.GA26857@vervain.rchland.ibm.com> <87skzfzkvh.fsf@firetop.home> <1204052325.7014.2.camel@otta> <47C467BA.1090308@redhat.com> <1204240130.7376.16.camel@otta> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:32:00 -0000 Message-Id: <1205163133.6782.57.camel@otta> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00627.txt.bz2 On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 17:08 -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: > HJ, > > Given the x86/x86_64 issues with the last indexed load/store patch, > can you SPEC test this patch to make sure the rtlanal.c change doesn't > affect you? Thanks. HJ, If you get a chance, can you please SPEC test the patch located in: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg01442.html just to make sure it doesn't have a negative impact on x86/x86_64? Thanks. Peter